Suppr超能文献

用于即刻牙本质封闭的不同粘结系统对自粘结树脂水门汀与牙本质粘结强度的影响。

Effect of Different Adhesive Systems Used for Immediate Dentin Sealing on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement to Dentin.

作者信息

Ferreira-Filho R C, Ely C, Amaral R C, Rodrigues J A, Roulet J-F, Cassoni A, Reis A F

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;43(4):391-397. doi: 10.2341/17-023-L. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate and three-month water storage behavior of adhesives when used for immediate dentin sealing (IDS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Four adhesive systems were used to perform IDS: a one-step self-etch (Xeno V), a two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond), a two-step etch-and-rinse (XP Bond), and a three-step etch-and-rinse (Optibond FL). For the control group, IDS was not performed. The self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem was used for the luting procedures. After seven days of water storage, specimens (n=6) were sectioned into beams (n=5) with an approximately 1-mm cross-sectional area. Half of the specimens were tested in tension after seven days of water storage at 37°C, while the other half was stored for three months prior to testing in tension using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). The failure pattern was determined using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) data were statistically analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test (α=0.05).

RESULTS

After seven days, the control group presented the lowest μTBS but did not differ from XP Bond and Clearfil SE Bond. After three months, there was no μTBS difference between the IDS groups and the control.

CONCLUSIONS

After seven days of water storage, the groups with IDS presented higher μTBS values than the control group, although XP Bond and Clearfil SE Bond did not present significant differences. However, after three months of storage in water, IDS groups did not differ significantly from control group, which did not receive IDS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查用于即刻牙本质封闭(IDS)的胶粘剂在即刻和三个月水储存条件下的行为。

方法和材料

使用四种胶粘剂系统进行IDS:一步自酸蚀(Xeno V)、两步自酸蚀(Clearfil SE Bond)、两步酸蚀冲洗(XP Bond)和三步酸蚀冲洗(Optibond FL)。对照组未进行IDS。使用自粘结树脂水门汀RelyX Unicem进行粘结操作。水储存七天后,将样本(n = 6)切成横截面面积约为1平方毫米的梁(n = 5)。一半样本在37°C水储存七天后进行拉伸测试,另一半在使用万能试验机(1毫米/分钟)进行拉伸测试前先储存三个月。使用体视显微镜和扫描电子显微镜确定失效模式。微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)数据通过双向方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

七天后,对照组的μTBS最低,但与XP Bond和Clearfil SE Bond无差异。三个月后,IDS组和对照组之间的μTBS无差异。

结论

水储存七天后,进行IDS的组的μTBS值高于对照组,尽管XP Bond和Clearfil SE Bond没有显著差异。然而,在水中储存三个月后,进行IDS的组与未进行IDS的对照组没有显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验