• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与使用鼠标-键盘和触摸板-键盘相比,计算机用户在使用触摸屏设备时的姿势和不适感评估。

Posture and discomfort assessment in computer users while using touch screen device as compared with mouse-keyboard and touch pad-keyboard.

作者信息

Kargar N, Choobineh A R, Razeghi M, Keshavarzi S, Meftahi N

机构信息

Department of Ergonomics, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Research Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Work. 2018;59(3):341-349. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182685.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-182685
PMID:29630576
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Touch screen computers require significant arm and hand movements. This can result to body discomfort and biomechanical load in users.

OBJECTIVES

This study was carried out to examine posture and users' discomfort while using touch screen device as compared with mouse-keyboard and touch pad-keyboard.

METHODS

Twenty three (23) students participated in this experimental study. The subjects completed pre-defined tasks in three 15 min trials by means of touch screen, touch pad-keyboard and mouse-keyboard as input devices. Postural angles were measured by Qualisys motion capture system. Body discomfort was assessed by a 10-cm visual analog scale. Rating scale was employed to assess the perception of subjects on the posture of body parts while utilizing the three devices.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in head inclination when using the three types of devices. Nevertheless, the mean of neck (p = 0.005) and trunk (p < 0.0001) inclinations as well as arm angle (p < 0.0001) while using touch screen, differed significantly from the two other devices and were more deviated from neutral posture. The type of input device was found to have significant effect on the right shoulder (p = 0.017), right elbow (p = 0.031), right wrist/hand (p = 0.004) and whole body discomfort (p = 0.026). Touch screen caused more discomfort in the mentioned regions when compared to the other two devices. Friedman test showed that differences of mean ratings for perceived shoulder and elbow postures in the 3 trials were significant (p = 0.005 and p = 0.011, respectively). Touch screen was the most unfavorable input device based on the subjects' judgment.

CONCLUSION

Touch screen caused more deviated postural angles, increased body discomfort and unfavorable postures.

摘要

背景

触摸屏电脑需要大幅度的手臂和手部动作。这可能导致用户身体不适和生物力学负荷。

目的

本研究旨在考察使用触摸屏设备时与使用鼠标键盘和触摸板键盘相比,用户的姿势和不适情况。

方法

23名学生参与了这项实验研究。受试者通过触摸屏、触摸板键盘和鼠标键盘作为输入设备,在三次15分钟的试验中完成预定义任务。姿势角度由Qualisys运动捕捉系统测量。身体不适通过10厘米视觉模拟量表进行评估。采用评分量表评估受试者在使用这三种设备时对身体部位姿势的感知。

结果

使用这三种类型的设备时,头部倾斜度没有显著差异。然而,使用触摸屏时颈部(p = 0.005)和躯干(p < 0.0001)的倾斜度以及手臂角度(p < 0.0001)的平均值与其他两种设备有显著差异,且更偏离中立姿势。发现输入设备类型对右肩(p = 0.017)、右肘(p = 0.031)、右手腕/手(p = 0.004)和全身不适(p = 0.026)有显著影响。与其他两种设备相比,触摸屏在上述区域引起更多不适。Friedman检验表明,三次试验中感知到的肩部和肘部姿势的平均评分差异显著(分别为p = 0.005和p = 0.011)。根据受试者的判断,触摸屏是最不利的输入设备。

结论

触摸屏导致更偏离的姿势角度、增加身体不适和不利姿势。

相似文献

1
Posture and discomfort assessment in computer users while using touch screen device as compared with mouse-keyboard and touch pad-keyboard.与使用鼠标-键盘和触摸板-键盘相比,计算机用户在使用触摸屏设备时的姿势和不适感评估。
Work. 2018;59(3):341-349. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182685.
2
Usage Position and Virtual Keyboard Design Affect Upper-Body Kinematics, Discomfort, and Usability during Prolonged Tablet Typing.使用姿势和虚拟键盘设计对长时间平板打字时的上身运动学、不适感及可用性产生影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 2;10(12):e0143585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143585. eCollection 2015.
3
Functional parameters, wrist posture deviations and comfort: A comparison between a computer mouse and a touch pen as input devices.功能参数、手腕姿势偏差与舒适度:电脑鼠标与触摸笔作为输入设备的比较
Work. 2020;65(4):701-706. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203124.
4
Effect of VDT keyboard height and inclination on musculoskeletal discomfort for wheelchair users.视频显示终端(VDT)键盘高度和倾斜度对轮椅使用者肌肉骨骼不适的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 2005 Apr;100(2):535-42. doi: 10.2466/pms.100.2.535-542.
5
Wrist and shoulder posture and muscle activity during touch-screen tablet use: effects of usage configuration, tablet type, and interacting hand.使用触摸屏平板电脑时的手腕和肩部姿势及肌肉活动:使用配置、平板电脑类型和交互手的影响
Work. 2013;45(1):59-71. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131604.
6
A comparison of the postures assumed when using laptop computers and desktop computers.使用笔记本电脑和台式电脑时所采取姿势的比较。
Appl Ergon. 1997 Aug;28(4):263-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(96)00073-7.
7
Influence of Input Hardware and Work Surface Angle on Upper Limb Posture in a Hybrid Computer Workstation.混合式计算机工作站中输入硬件和工作台面角度对上肢姿势的影响。
Hum Factors. 2016 Feb;58(1):107-19. doi: 10.1177/0018720815607317. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
8
Computer users' postures and associations with workstation characteristics.计算机用户的姿势及其与工作站特征的关联。
AIHAJ. 2000 Mar-Apr;61(2):223-30. doi: 10.1080/15298660008984531.
9
Tablet Keyboard Configuration Affects Performance, Discomfort and Task Difficulty for Thumb Typing in a Two-Handed Grip.平板键盘配置会影响双手握持时拇指打字的性能、不适感和任务难度。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 26;8(6):e67525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067525. Print 2013.
10
Evaluating biomechanics of user-selected sitting and standing computer workstation.评估用户选择的坐立和站立式计算机工作站的生物力学。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Parkinson's Remote Interactive Monitoring System in a Clinical Setting: Usability Study.在临床环境中评估帕金森远程互动监测系统:可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 24;11:e54145. doi: 10.2196/54145.
2
The Effect of Lockdown Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Digital Eye Strain Symptoms Among the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Survey.《COVID-19 大流行期间封锁对普通人群数字眼疲劳症状的影响:一项横断面调查》。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;10:895517. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.895517. eCollection 2022.
3
Implementation of Mobile Psychological Testing on Smart Devices: Evaluation of a ResearchKit-Based Design Approach for the Implicit Association Test.
智能设备上移动心理测试的实施:基于ResearchKit的内隐联想测验设计方法评估
Front Digit Health. 2022 Mar 18;4:785591. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.785591. eCollection 2022.