Lee Oh-Hyun, Kim Jung-Sun, Pak Hui-Nam, Hong Geu-Ru, Shim Chi Young, Uhm Jae-Sun, Cho In-Jeong, Joung Boyoung, Yu Cheol-Woong, Lee Hyun-Jong, Kang Woong-Chol, Shin Eun-Seok, Choi Rak-Kyeong, Lim Do-Sun, Jang Yangsoo
Division of Cardiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jun 15;121(12):1534-1539. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.02.045. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
This study sought to investigate the safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who have LAA thrombus. From October 2010 to October 2016, LAA occlusions were performed in facilities within a Korean multicenter registry in patients without (n = 132) or with (n = 10) LAA thrombus (detected during preprocedural assessments). The incidences of periprocedural complications, including stroke, pericardial tamponade, major bleeding, and device embolization, were assessed and compared between the groups. The incidence of periprocedural complications was not significantly different between patients with and without LAA thrombus (0% vs 5% [6 of 132]; p = 0.49). During the mean 23.2 ± 17.5-month follow-up duration, 7 major adverse cardiac events occurred (1 cardiovascular death, 6 ischemic strokes), but overall event rates were not significantly different between the groups (14% vs 9%; p = 0.47). In conclusion, percutaneous LAA occlusion in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with LAA thrombus may be a safe and feasible alternative to anticoagulation in select patients at a high risk of bleeding or contraindication to anticoagulation, or in whom anticoagulation failed to prevent stroke.
本研究旨在调查经皮左心耳(LAA)封堵术在预防非瓣膜性心房颤动合并LAA血栓患者中风方面的安全性。2010年10月至2016年10月,在韩国多中心登记处的医疗机构中,对无LAA血栓(n = 132)或有LAA血栓(术前评估时检测到,n = 10)的患者进行了LAA封堵术。评估并比较了两组围手术期并发症的发生率,包括中风、心包填塞、大出血和器械栓塞。有LAA血栓和无LAA血栓的患者围手术期并发症发生率无显著差异(0%对5%[132例中的6例];p = 0.49)。在平均23.2±17.5个月的随访期内,发生了7起主要不良心脏事件(1例心血管死亡,6例缺血性中风),但两组的总体事件发生率无显著差异(14%对9%;p = 0.47)。总之,对于有LAA血栓的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者,经皮LAA封堵术可能是一种安全可行的替代抗凝治疗的方法,适用于有高出血风险或抗凝禁忌证的特定患者,或抗凝治疗未能预防中风的患者。