Preventive Behavioral Health Programs in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT

Early childhood is a critical period for socioemotional development. Primary care is a promising setting for behavioral health programs.

OBJECTIVES

To identify gaps in the literature on effectiveness and readiness for scale-up of behavioral health programs in primary care.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published in English in the past 15 years. Search terms included terms to describe intervention content, setting, target population, and names of specific programs known to fit inclusion criteria.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria were: (1) enrolled children 0 to 5 years old, (2) primary care setting, (3) measured parenting or child behavior outcomes, and (4) clinical trial, quasi-experimental trial, pilot study, or pre-post design.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were abstracted from 44 studies. The rigor of individual studies and evidence base as a whole were compared with the Society of Prevention Research's standards for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research.

RESULTS

Gaps in the literature include: study findings do not always support hypotheses about interventions' mechanisms, trust in primary care as a mediator has not been sufficiently studied, it is unclear to which target populations study findings can be applied, parent participation remains an important challenge, and the long-term impact requires further evaluation.

LIMITATIONS

Potential limitations include publication bias, selective reporting within studies, and an incomplete search.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting gaps in the literature could enhance understanding of the efficacy, effectiveness, and readiness for scale-up of these programs.