Fernández-Antelo Inmaculada, Cuadrado-Gordillo Isabel
Psychology and Anthropology, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 26;9:396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00396. eCollection 2018.
Understanding the causes of adolescents' aggressive behavior in and through technological means and resources requires a thorough analysis of the criteria that they consider to be identifying and defining cyberbullying and of the network of relationships established between the different criteria. The present study has aimed at making a foray into the attempt to understand the underlying structures and mechanisms that determine aggressors' and victims' perceptions of the cyberbullying phenomenon. The sample consisted of 2148 adolescents (49.1% girls; = 0.5) of ages from 12 to 16 ( = 13.9; = 1.2). The data collected through a validated questionnaire for this study whose dimensions were confirmed from the data extracted from the focus groups and a CFA of the victim and aggressor subsamples. The analysis of the data is completed with CFA and the construction of structural models. The results have shown the importance and interdependence of imbalance of power and intention to harm in the aggressors' perceptual structure. The criteria of anonymity and repetition are related to the asymmetry of power, giving greater prominence to this factor. In its perceptual structure, the criterion "social relationship" also appears, which indicates that the manifestations of cyberbullying are sometimes interpreted as patterns of behavior that have become massively extended among the adolescent population, and have become accepted as a normalized and harmless way of communicating with other adolescents. In the victims' perceptual structure the key factor is the intention to harm, closely linked to the asymmetry of power and publicity. Anonymity, revenge and repetition are also present in this structure, although its relationship with cyberbullying is indirect. These results allow to design more effective measures of prevention and intervention closely tailored to addressing directly the factors that are considered to be predictors of risk.
要通过技术手段和资源来理解青少年攻击性行为的成因,就需要深入分析他们认为可用于识别和界定网络欺凌的标准,以及不同标准之间建立的关系网络。本研究旨在尝试深入了解那些决定欺凌者和受害者对网络欺凌现象认知的潜在结构和机制。样本包括2148名年龄在12至16岁之间的青少年(女孩占49.1%;均值 = 0.5)(均值 = 13.9;标准差 = 1.2)。数据通过为本研究验证的问卷收集,该问卷的维度从焦点小组提取的数据以及受害者和欺凌者子样本的验证性因素分析中得到确认。数据通过验证性因素分析和结构模型构建完成分析。结果表明,在欺凌者的认知结构中,权力失衡和伤害意图具有重要性和相互依存性。匿名性和重复性标准与权力不对称相关,使这一因素更为突出。在其认知结构中,还出现了“社会关系”标准,这表明网络欺凌的表现有时被解释为在青少年群体中广泛传播的行为模式,并已被视为与其他青少年交流的一种正常且无害的方式。在受害者的认知结构中,关键因素是伤害意图,它与权力不对称和公开性紧密相连。匿名性、报复和重复性也存在于这一结构中,尽管它们与网络欺凌的关系是间接的。这些结果有助于设计更有效的预防和干预措施,这些措施紧密贴合直接应对被视为风险预测因素的因素。