• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝胆胰外科手术中的浅表手术部位感染:皮内缝合与皮肤钉合的比较。

Superficial Surgical Site Infection in Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery: Subcuticular Suture Versus Skin Staples.

机构信息

Department of Digestive and Transplantation Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, 1163 Tatemachi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, 193-0998, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Aug;22(8):1385-1393. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3754-5. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-018-3754-5
PMID:29633116
Abstract

PURPOSE

Postoperative superficial surgical site infection is a major complication in hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. We aimed to compare the efficacy of subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in preventing superficial surgical site infection in hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery at our hospital from October 2006 to March 2011 and from April 2012 to March 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Superficial surgical site infection incidence was evaluated in patients who received subcuticular sutures and those who received staples for skin closure. Propensity score matching analysis was used to adjust bias from confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 691 patients were included. Patients with skin staple closures (n = 346) were compared with patients with subcuticular suture closures (n = 345). After a propensity score matching analysis, a significant difference in superficial surgical site infection incidence was found between the skin stapler group (11.3%) and subcuticular sutures group (2.6%). The same comparison was performed by a subgroup analysis and supported this finding in patients after hepatectomy without biliary reconstruction, pancreatoduodenectomy, or open laparotomy surgeries and in patients with body mass index < 25.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcuticular suturing after hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery was more efficacious in reducing postoperative superficial surgical site infection incidence than staples for skin closure.

摘要

目的

术后切口浅层感染是肝胆胰外科的主要并发症。本研究旨在比较皮内缝合与皮肤钉合在预防肝胆胰外科术后切口浅层感染的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析 2006 年 10 月至 2011 年 3 月和 2012 年 4 月至 2015 年 3 月期间在我院行肝胆胰手术的连续患者。评估接受皮内缝合和皮肤钉合的患者切口浅层感染的发生率。采用倾向性评分匹配分析来调整混杂因素的偏倚。

结果

共纳入 691 例患者。比较了行皮肤钉合(n=346)和皮内缝合(n=345)的患者。经倾向性评分匹配分析后,皮肤钉合组(11.3%)与皮内缝合组(2.6%)的切口浅层感染发生率差异有统计学意义。亚组分析的结果支持这一发现,在未行胆道重建的肝切除术、胰十二指肠切除术或剖腹手术的患者和 BMI<25 的患者中差异更显著。

结论

与皮肤钉合相比,肝胆胰手术后皮内缝合更能有效降低术后切口浅层感染的发生率。

相似文献

1
Superficial Surgical Site Infection in Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery: Subcuticular Suture Versus Skin Staples.肝胆胰外科手术中的浅表手术部位感染:皮内缝合与皮肤钉合的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Aug;22(8):1385-1393. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3754-5. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
2
Subcuticular suture and incisional surgical-site infection in elective hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: an open-label, pragmatic randomized clinical trial (CLOSKIN trial).皮下缝合与切口部位手术感染在择期肝胆胰腺手术中的作用:一项开放标签、实用随机临床试验(CLOSKIN 试验)。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01911-0.
3
Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.皮下缝合与钉合在胃肠外科手术后皮肤缝合中的应用:一项 3 期、多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 Sep 28;382(9898):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61780-8.
4
Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.非产科手术中用于皮肤缝合的皮下缝合线
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012124.pub2.
5
Subcuticular sutures reduce surgical site infection after repeat liver resection: a matched cohort analysis.皮下缝合可降低重复肝切除术后手术部位感染的风险:一项匹配队列分析。
Biosci Trends. 2021 Jan 23;14(6):422-427. doi: 10.5582/bst.2020.03315. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.开放性腹部手术后皮下缝合与吻合钉皮肤闭合的随机对照比较:一项多中心开放标签随机对照试验
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Dec;20(12):2083-2092. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3283-z. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
7
Advantages of skin closure with subcuticular suture for liver resection on postoperative and cosmetic outcomes: a propensity matched analysis.皮内缝合在肝切除术后和美容效果方面的优势:倾向匹配分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 May;407(3):1121-1129. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02388-2. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
8
Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.肥胖女性剖宫产术后伤口并发症:皮肤钉合与皮下缝合的比较
J Perinatol. 2016 Oct;36(10):819-22. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.89. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
9
Is the Risk of Infection Lower with Sutures than with Staples for Skin Closure After Orthopaedic Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.骨科手术后皮肤缝合中使用缝线比使用吻合器的感染风险更低吗?一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):922-937. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000690.
10
Efficacy of skin closure with subcuticular sutures for preventing wound infection after resection of colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.皮下缝合用于预防结直肠癌切除术后伤口感染的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Dec;400(8):961-6. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1347-2. Epub 2015 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Surgical Wound Infection and Fascial Dehiscence After Open Gynecologic Oncologic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.开放性妇科肿瘤手术后手术伤口感染和筋膜裂开的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;16(24):4157. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244157.
2
Wound Closure and Wound Dressings in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery From the AO Spine Surveillance of Post-Operative Management.成人脊柱畸形手术中的伤口闭合与伤口敷料——来自AO脊柱术后管理监测
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan;15(1):152-160. doi: 10.1177/21925682241262749. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
3
Delayed versus primary closure to minimize risk of surgical-site infection for complicated appendicitis: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial using counterfactual prediction modeling.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology and risk factors associated with surgical site infection after different types of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.不同类型肝胆胰手术后手术部位感染的流行病学及相关危险因素
Surg Today. 2017 Oct;47(10):1208-1214. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1503-0. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Disparities in the management and prophylaxis of surgical site infection and pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术后手术部位感染和胰瘘的管理和预防的差异。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 May;24(5):268-280. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.443. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
3
Performance improvement initiative: prevention of surgical site infection (SSI).
延迟缝合与一期缝合以降低复杂性阑尾炎手术部位感染风险:一项使用反事实预测模型的随机试验的二次分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;45(3):322-328. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.214. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
4
Subcuticular suture and incisional surgical-site infection in elective hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: an open-label, pragmatic randomized clinical trial (CLOSKIN trial).皮下缝合与切口部位手术感染在择期肝胆胰腺手术中的作用:一项开放标签、实用随机临床试验(CLOSKIN 试验)。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01911-0.
5
Skin Closure Technique and Postprocedural Pain after Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation: A Retrospective Review.脊髓刺激器植入术后的皮肤缝合技术与术后疼痛:回顾性研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Jun 4;2021:9912861. doi: 10.1155/2021/9912861. eCollection 2021.
6
Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.皮下缝合与皮钉在腹部手术切口缝合中的Meta 分析:随机对照试验研究
PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0251022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251022. eCollection 2021.
绩效改进计划:预防手术部位感染(SSI)
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 May 12;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u205401.w3279. eCollection 2015.
4
Comparing Mechanical Bowel Preparation With Both Oral and Systemic Antibiotics Versus Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Systemic Antibiotics Alone for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.比较机械肠道准备联合口服及全身应用抗生素与单纯机械肠道准备及全身应用抗生素预防择期结直肠手术后手术部位感染:一项随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Jan;59(1):70-78. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000524.
5
Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States.美国术后再次住院的潜在原因。
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):483-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.18614.
6
Infectious postoperative complications decrease long-term survival in patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer: a study of 12,075 patients.术后感染并发症降低接受结直肠癌根治性手术患者的长期生存率:一项 12075 例患者的研究。
Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):497-505. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000854.
7
Risk factors of surgical site infection after hepatic resection.肝切除术后手术部位感染的危险因素。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;35(3):317-20. doi: 10.1086/675278. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
8
Pressurized pulse irrigation with saline reduces surgical-site infections following major hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: randomized controlled trial.生理盐水加压脉冲冲洗可降低肝胆胰大手术后的手术部位感染:随机对照试验
World J Surg. 2014 Feb;38(2):447-55. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2309-x.
9
Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.皮下缝合与钉合在胃肠外科手术后皮肤缝合中的应用:一项 3 期、多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 Sep 28;382(9898):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61780-8.
10
Proposal for a sub-classification of hepato-biliary-pancreatic operations for surgical site infection surveillance following assessment of results of prospective multicenter data.基于前瞻性多中心数据评估结果,提出肝胆胰手术部位感染监测的亚分类建议。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jun;20(5):504-11. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0590-y.