Suppr超能文献

老年 2 型糖尿病患者强化血糖管理的应用。

Use of Intensive Glycemic Management in Older Adults with Diabetes Mellitus.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.

University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(6):1190-1194. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15335. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the proportion of older adults with diabetes mellitus treated with tight glucose control and the factors associated with this practice.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

Outpatient sites in the Diabetes Collaborative Registry (N=151).

PARTICIPANTS

Adults aged 75 and older with type 2 diabetes mellitus (N=42,669).

MEASUREMENTS

Participants were categorized based on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glucose-lowering medications: poor control (HbA1c >9%), moderate control (HbA1c 8-9%), conservative control (HbA1c 7-8%), tight control (HbA1c <7%) with low-risk agents (low risk for hypoglycemia), tight control with high-risk agents, and diet control (HbA1c <7% taking no glucose-lowering medications). We used hierarchical logistic regression to examine participant and site factors associated with tight control and high-risk agents versus conservative or tight control and low-risk agents.

RESULTS

Of 30,696 participants without diet-controlled diabetes, 5,596 (18%) had moderate or poor control, 9,227 (30%) had conservative control, 7,893 (26%) had tight control taking low-risk agents, and 7,980 (26%) had tight control taking high-risk agents. Older age, male sex, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease were each independently associated with greater odds of tight control with high-risk agents. There were no differences according to practice specialty (endocrinology, primary care, cardiology) in how aggressively participants were managed.

CONCLUSION

One-quarter of U.S. older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus are tightly controlled with glucose-lowering medications that have a high risk of hypoglycemia. These results suggest potential overtreatment of a substantial proportion of people and should encourage further efforts to translate guidelines to daily practice.

摘要

目的

调查接受严格血糖控制治疗的老年糖尿病患者比例,以及与该治疗实践相关的因素。

设计

横断面分析。

地点

糖尿病协作注册研究的门诊点(N=151)。

参与者

年龄 75 岁及以上的 2 型糖尿病患者(N=42669)。

测量方法

根据糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和降血糖药物将参与者分类:控制不佳(HbA1c>9%)、控制适度(HbA1c 8-9%)、保守控制(HbA1c 7-8%)、严格控制(HbA1c<7%)且使用低风险药物(低血糖风险低)、严格控制且使用高风险药物、以及饮食控制(HbA1c<7%且未使用降血糖药物)。我们采用分层逻辑回归分析与严格控制和高风险药物与保守或严格控制和低风险药物相关的患者和地点因素。

结果

在 30696 例无饮食控制的糖尿病患者中,5596 例(18%)血糖控制不佳或较差,9227 例(30%)采用保守控制,7893 例(26%)采用低风险药物的严格控制,7980 例(26%)采用高风险药物的严格控制。年龄较大、男性、心力衰竭、慢性肾脏病和冠状动脉疾病与使用高风险药物进行严格控制的可能性更大独立相关。根据实践专业(内分泌学、初级保健、心脏病学),参与者的管理方式没有差异。

结论

四分之一的美国 2 型老年糖尿病患者接受低血糖风险高的降血糖药物进行严格控制。这些结果表明,相当一部分人可能存在过度治疗,应鼓励进一步努力将指南转化为日常实践。

相似文献

10
Intensive glycemic control in younger and older U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes.美国年轻和老年 2 型糖尿病患者的强化血糖控制。
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Aug;31(8):1299-1304. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 18.

引用本文的文献

5
13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.13. 老年人:2025年糖尿病护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S266-S282. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S013.
8
13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.13. 老年人:2024年糖尿病护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S244-S257. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S013.

本文引用的文献

1
8. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment.8. 血糖治疗的药理学方法。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S64-S74. doi: 10.2337/dc17-S011.
10
Diabetes in older adults.老年人糖尿病
Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):2650-64. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1801. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验