Suppr超能文献

阿莫西林克拉维酸钾口服速释制剂是否需要进行克拉维酸的生物等效性研究?

Is the demonstration of bioequivalence for clavulanic acid required in amoxicillin-clavulanic acid orally administered immediate-release products?

机构信息

Zeino Pharma LLC, Khalifa Industrial Zone, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Irma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;70(7):883-892. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12920. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Bioequivalence (BE) criteria for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (Co-amoxiclav) oral formulations are based on 90% confidence interval for both amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. The aim of this work is to explore the relevance of demonstrating BE of clavulanic acid in Co-amoxiclav oral formulations and also to assess the impact on safety and efficacy of product due to bioinequivalent clavulanic acid.

METHODS AND KEY FINDINGS

The subtherapeutic levels of clavulanic acid would continue to exert their action against β-lactamases due to postβ-lactamase inhibitor effect. Additionally, only minute quantities are required to inhibit β-lactamases. Majority of adverse effects associated with Co-amoxiclav are of less serious nature, therefore, risk due to suprabioavailable clavulanic acid was determined to be low. 'Very rapid clavulanic acid release' in in vitro dissolution test would ensure that clinically significant differences between test and reference formulations if any are detected in advance. As an additional risk mitigation strategy, WHO recommends qualitative and quantitative composition similarity between test and reference formulations to ensure excipients do not adversely impact bioavailability.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-amoxiclav with non-bioequivalent clavulanic acid, but bioequivalent amoxicillin would still achieve its therapeutic objectives without exposing patients to unwanted adverse effects. Therefore, the current regulatory criterion of demonstrating BE of clavulanic acid appears conservative.

摘要

目的

阿莫西林克拉维酸(复方阿莫西林)口服制剂的生物等效性(BE)标准基于阿莫西林和克拉维酸的 90%置信区间。本工作旨在探讨证明复方阿莫西林中克拉维酸的 BE 的相关性,以及由于生物不等效克拉维酸对产品的安全性和疗效的影响。

方法和主要发现

克拉维酸的亚治疗水平由于后β-内酰胺酶抑制剂效应,将继续对β-内酰胺酶发挥作用。此外,只需要微量的克拉维酸就可以抑制β-内酰胺酶。与复方阿莫西林相关的大多数不良反应性质较轻,因此,由于克拉维酸超生物利用度而导致的风险被确定为低风险。体外溶出试验中的“非常快速的克拉维酸释放”将确保如果在任何临床前检测到试验和参比制剂之间存在临床显著差异。作为额外的风险缓解策略,世界卫生组织建议试验和参比制剂的定性和定量组成相似,以确保赋形剂不会对生物利用度产生不利影响。

结论

即使克拉维酸的生物等效性不达标,但阿莫西林生物等效的复方阿莫西林仍将实现其治疗目标,而不会使患者面临不必要的不良反应。因此,目前证明克拉维酸的 BE 的监管标准似乎过于保守。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验