• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对一种用于长期使用的涤纶套囊血液透析导管的前瞻性评估。

Prospective evaluation of a Dacron cuffed hemodialysis catheter for prolonged use.

作者信息

Schwab S J, Buller G L, McCann R L, Bollinger R R, Stickel D L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 1988 Feb;11(2):166-9. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(88)80206-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0272-6386(88)80206-3
PMID:2963538
Abstract

Double lumen subclavian venous hemodialysis catheters are in wide use in the United States to provide temporary vascular access. The disadvantages of these catheters include a high infection rate and short use-life (2 to 3 weeks). We evaluated a felt cuffed tunnelled jugular venous hemodialysis catheter (PermCath) to determine its ability to overcome these shortcomings and compared it with standard noncuffed double lumen dialysis catheters. Eighty PermCaths were inserted during this prospective study in patients needing temporary vascular access in excess of 1 month. Median use-life of these catheters was 8 weeks with a use range of 3 weeks to 5.4 months. Only four functioning catheters failed before elective removal. Despite the prolonged use-life there was only one episode of catheter mediated bacteremia. Seven catheters (9%) failed to function immediately after insertion. These failures were caused by catheter kinking in the region of the felt cuff. Thrombosis of the catheter lumen was the most frequent complication (137 episodes) but resolved in over 95% of the instances with urokinase instillation. Exit site infections (23 instances) were successfully treated conservatively. We conclude that the PermCath (Quinton Instrument Co, Seattle) is a safe and reliable new device with a low complication rate and a longer use-life than standard subclavian dialysis catheters. This longer use-life allows more time for maturation of primary arteriovenous (AV) fistulas and Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheters, and provides time for the healing of infected vascular access grafts. Its primary disadvantage is the need for surgical insertion.

摘要

双腔锁骨下静脉血液透析导管在美国被广泛用于提供临时血管通路。这些导管的缺点包括感染率高和使用寿命短(2至3周)。我们评估了一种带毡套隧道式颈静脉血液透析导管(PermCath),以确定其克服这些缺点的能力,并将其与标准的无套双腔透析导管进行比较。在这项前瞻性研究中,为超过1个月需要临时血管通路的患者插入了80根PermCath导管。这些导管的中位使用寿命为8周,使用范围为3周至5.4个月。只有4根功能正常的导管在择期拔除前出现故障。尽管使用寿命延长,但仅发生了1次导管介导的菌血症。7根导管(9%)在插入后立即无法正常工作。这些故障是由毡套区域的导管扭结引起的。导管腔血栓形成是最常见的并发症(137例),但超过95%的病例通过尿激酶灌注得以解决。出口部位感染(23例)通过保守治疗成功治愈。我们得出结论,PermCath(昆顿仪器公司,西雅图)是一种安全可靠的新装置,并发症发生率低,使用寿命比标准锁骨下透析导管更长。这种更长的使用寿命为原发性动静脉(AV)内瘘和Tenckhoff腹膜透析导管的成熟留出了更多时间,并为感染的血管通路移植物的愈合提供了时间。其主要缺点是需要手术插入。

相似文献

1
Prospective evaluation of a Dacron cuffed hemodialysis catheter for prolonged use.对一种用于长期使用的涤纶套囊血液透析导管的前瞻性评估。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1988 Feb;11(2):166-9. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(88)80206-3.
2
Using cuffed and tunnelled central venous catheters as permanent vascular access for hemodialysis: a prospective study.使用带 cuff 的隧道式中心静脉导管作为血液透析的永久性血管通路:一项前瞻性研究。
Ren Fail. 2003 May;25(3):431-8. doi: 10.1081/jdi-120021155.
3
Use of Dacron cuffed silicone catheters as long-term hemodialysis access.使用带涤纶套的硅胶导管作为长期血液透析通路。
ASAIO J. 1992 Jan-Mar;38(1):55-8. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199201000-00013.
4
Short-term infection in cuffed versus noncuffed small bore central catheters: a randomized trial.带囊与不带囊小口径中心导管短期感染:一项随机试验。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):203-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.020. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
5
Temporary hemodialysis catheters as a long-term vascular access in chronic hemodialysis patients.临时血液透析导管作为慢性血液透析患者的长期血管通路。
Ther Apher Dial. 2005 Jun;9(3):250-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1774-9987.2005.00265.x.
6
Supraclavicular approach to the subclavian/innominate vein for large-bore central venous catheters.用于大口径中心静脉导管的锁骨上入路至锁骨下/无名静脉
Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Dec;30(6):802-8. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90085-8.
7
Use of a silicone dual-lumen catheter with a Dacron cuff as a long-term vascular access for hemodialysis patients.使用带有涤纶套囊的硅胶双腔导管作为血液透析患者的长期血管通路。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1990 Sep;16(3):211-5. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)81020-1.
8
Experience with the double lumen Silastic catheter for hemoaccess.双腔硅橡胶导管用于血液通路的经验。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Jul;171(1):33-9.
9
Central venous dialysis access: experience with a dual-lumen, silicone rubber catheter.中心静脉透析通路:双腔硅橡胶导管的应用经验
Surgery. 1987 Nov;102(5):784-9.
10
Silastic cuffed catheters for hemodialysis vascular access: thrombolytic and mechanical correction of malfunction.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1996 Sep;28(3):379-86. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90495-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines on vascular access for hemodialysis from the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery.巴西血管病学和血管外科学会血液透析血管通路指南。
J Vasc Bras. 2023 Oct 30;22:e20230052. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300522. eCollection 2023.
2
A Comparative Study of Continuous Versus Interrupted Suturing Technique in Creating a Vascular Access for Hemodialysis: An Institutional-Based Experience.连续缝合技术与间断缝合技术在建立血液透析血管通路中的比较研究:基于机构的经验
Cureus. 2023 Jul 17;15(7):e42004. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42004. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections and Catheter Colonization among Haemodialysis Patients: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.
血液透析患者的导管相关血流感染和导管定植:患病率、危险因素及结局
Int J Nephrol. 2021 Jun 19;2021:5562690. doi: 10.1155/2021/5562690. eCollection 2021.
4
Outcome of Cuffed Tunneled Dialysis Catheters for Hemodialysis Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.三级保健医院血液透析患者带袖口隧道透析导管的结果:描述性横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020 Jun 30;58(226):390-395. doi: 10.31729/jnma.4795.
5
Patency and outcomes of tunneled hemodialysis catheter via femoral versus jugular vein access.经股静脉与颈静脉入路的带隧道血液透析导管的通畅性及结局
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):81-84. doi: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_383_18.
6
Clinical and Regulatory Considerations for Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis.用于血液透析的中心静脉导管的临床和监管注意事项。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Dec 7;13(12):1924-1932. doi: 10.2215/CJN.14251217. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
7
Difficulties with tunneling of the cuffed catheter: a single-centre experience.带囊导管隧道困难:单中心经验。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 20;8(1):3314. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21338-5.
8
Fistula First Initiative: Historical Impact on Vascular Access Practice Patterns and Influence on Future Vascular Access Care.首次内瘘倡议:对血管通路实践模式的历史影响及对未来血管通路护理的影响
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2017 Sep;8(3):244-254. doi: 10.1007/s13239-017-0319-9. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
9
Comparison of treatment delay associated with tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement between interventionists.介入医生之间与隧道式血液透析导管置入相关的治疗延迟比较。
Korean J Intern Med. 2016 May;31(3):543-51. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.377. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
10
Safety and Complications of Double-Lumen Tunnelled Cuffed Central Venous Dialysis Catheters: Clinical and radiological perspective from a tertiary centre in Oman.带 cuff 的双腔隧道式中心静脉透析导管的安全性与并发症:来自阿曼一家三级中心的临床与放射学视角
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2015 Nov;15(4):e501-6. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2015.15.04.010. Epub 2015 Nov 23.