• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖学知识与核心创伤能力血管技能评估

Assessment of Anatomical Knowledge and Core Trauma Competency Vascular Skills.

作者信息

Granite Guinevere, Pugh Kristy, Chen Hegang, Longinaker Nyaradzo, Garofalo Evan, Shackelford Stacy, Shalin Valerie, Puche Adam, Pasley Jason, Sarani Babak, Henry Sharon, Bowyer Mark, Mackenzie Colin

机构信息

Shock Trauma Anesthesiology Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201.

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(suppl_1):66-72. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx151.

DOI:10.1093/milmed/usx151
PMID:29635562
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Surgical residents express confidence in performing specific vascular exposures before training, but such self-reported confidence did not correlate with co-located evaluator ratings. This study reports residents' self-confidence evaluated before and after Advanced Surgical Skills for Exposure in Trauma (ASSET) cadaver-based training, and 12-18 mo later. We hypothesize that residents will better judge their own skill after ASSET than before when compared with evaluator ratings.

METHODS

Forty PGY2-7 surgical residents performed four procedures: axillary artery (AA), brachial artery (BA), femoral artery exposure and control (FA), and lower extremity fasciotomy (FAS) at the three evaluations. Using 5-point Likert scales, surgeons self-assessed their confidence in anatomical understanding and procedure performance after each procedure and evaluators rated each surgeon accordingly.

RESULTS

For all the three evaluations, residents consistently rated their anatomical understanding (p < 0.04) and surgical performance (p < 0.03) higher than evaluators for both FA and FAS. Residents rated their anatomical understanding and surgical performance higher (p < 0.005) than evaluators for BA after training and up to 18 mo later. Only for third AA evaluation were there no rating differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents overrate their anatomical understanding and performance abilities for BA, FA, and FAS even after performing the procedures and being debriefed three times in 18 mo.

摘要

目的

外科住院医师在培训前对进行特定血管暴露手术表现出信心,但这种自我报告的信心与现场评估者的评分并不相关。本研究报告了住院医师在基于尸体的创伤暴露高级外科技能(ASSET)培训前后以及12 - 18个月后的自信心情况。我们假设与评估者评分相比,住院医师在接受ASSET培训后比培训前能更好地判断自己的技能。

方法

40名PGY2 - 7级外科住院医师在三次评估中进行四项手术:腋动脉(AA)、肱动脉(BA)、股动脉暴露与控制(FA)以及下肢筋膜切开术(FAS)。外科医生使用5点李克特量表在每次手术后自我评估他们对解剖学理解和手术操作的信心,评估者据此对每位外科医生进行评分。

结果

在所有三次评估中,对于FA和FAS,住院医师对自己解剖学理解(p < 0.04)和手术操作(p < 0.03)的评分一直高于评估者。培训后直至18个月,住院医师对BA的解剖学理解和手术操作评分高于评估者(p < 0.005)。只有第三次AA评估时没有评分差异。

结论

即使在进行了手术并在18个月内进行了三次汇报后,住院医师对BA、FA和FAS手术的解剖学理解和操作能力仍高估了自己的水平。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Anatomical Knowledge and Core Trauma Competency Vascular Skills.解剖学知识与核心创伤能力血管技能评估
Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(suppl_1):66-72. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx151.
2
Head-camera video recordings of trauma core competency procedures can evaluate surgical resident's technical performance as well as colocated evaluators.创伤核心能力程序的头戴式摄像机视频记录可以评估外科住院医师的技术表现以及现场评估人员的表现。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1 Suppl 1):S124-S129. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001467.
3
Performance of Vascular Exposure and Fasciotomy Among Surgical Residents Before and After Training Compared With Experts.与专家相比,外科住院医师培训前后血管暴露和筋膜切开术的操作表现。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jun 1;152(6):581-588. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0092.
4
Critical errors in infrequently performed trauma procedures after training.培训后很少进行的创伤程序中的关键错误。
Surgery. 2019 Nov;166(5):835-843. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.031. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
5
Perception does not equal reality for resident vascular trauma skills.对于住院医师的血管创伤技能而言,认知并不等同于现实。
J Surg Res. 2015 Oct;198(2):280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.082. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Using an Individual Procedure Score Before and After the Advanced Surgical Skills Exposure for Trauma Course Training to Benchmark a Hemorrhage-Control Performance Metric.在高级创伤手术技能暴露课程培训前后使用个体程序评分来衡量出血控制性能指标。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):1278-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
7
Can hyper-realistic physical models of peripheral vessel exposure and fasciotomy replace cadavers for performance assessment?超逼真的外周血管暴露和筋膜切开术物理模型能否替代尸体进行性能评估?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1 Suppl 1):S130-S135. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001419.
8
An intensive vascular surgical skills and simulation course for vascular trainees improves procedural knowledge and self-rated procedural competence.为血管外科实习生开设的强化血管外科技能与模拟课程可提高程序知识和自我评估的程序能力。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):907-915.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.065.
9
Development and validation of trauma surgical skills metrics: Preliminary assessment of performance after training.创伤外科技能指标的制定与验证:培训后绩效的初步评估。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Jul;79(1):105-10. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000685.
10
Cadaver-Based Trauma Procedural Skills Training: Skills Retention 30 Months after Training among Practicing Surgeons in Comparison to Experts or More Recently Trained Residents.尸体创伤程序技能训练:与专家或最近接受培训的住院医师相比,实践外科医生在培训 30 个月后的技能保留情况。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Aug;227(2):270-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 May 4.