An automated intravaginal dynamometer: Reliability metrics and the impact of testing protocol on active and passive forces measured from the pelvic floor muscles.

AIMS

(1) To determine the reliability of an automated dynamometer designed to assess pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and resistance to passive elongation. (2) To evaluate the impact of PFM length and rate of tissue elongation on dynamometric outcomes.

METHODS

At each of two sessions, twenty nulliparous women performed three maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) of their PFMs with the dynamometer set to two different anteroposterior (AP) diameters (25 mm, 35 mm). Next, with PFMs relaxed, the arms of the dynamometer opened three times to 40 mm at two speeds (25 mm/s, 50 mm/s). Outcomes included baseline force, peak force, relative peak force, rate of force development (RFD), stiffness and stress relaxation. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to test trial, day, and task effects (α = 0.05), and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed.

RESULTS

Forces measured on MVC were higher with the larger AP diameter, and passive resistance was higher for the faster rate of tissue elongation. The between-trial reliability of all outcomes was excellent (0.82 < ICC < 0.98) for all measures except for peak force during the passive elongation task (0.56 < ICC < 0.93). Between-day reliability was good to excellent for active and passive RFD (0.75 < ICC < 0.93), stiffness (ICC = 0.77) and relative peak force (0.71 < ICC < 0.87); absolute force (0.11 < ICC < 0.85) and stress relaxation responses (0.19 < ICC < 0.98) tended to be less reliable.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability of the dynamometer is adequate for both clinical and research applications. Relative forces were more reliable than absolute forces. Dimensions and rate of tissue elongation should be controlled and reported with all pelvic floor muscle assessments as these parameters impact outcomes.