O'Connell Joseph, Weiner Gary
Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017 Sep 5;1(1):e000157. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000157. eCollection 2017.
Determine whether tracheal intubation of extremely low birthweight (ELBW) neonates is more successful with a size-0 or size-00 Miller laryngoscope blade.
Randomised crossover simulation study.
Simulated neonatal intensive care unit environment.
Neonatology physicians and nurse practitioners (n=55).
Subjects performed four intubations in succession on a high-fidelity ELBW manikin with size-0 Miller and size-00 Miller blades from two different manufacturers. The intubation sequence was randomised. Intubations were recorded and scored for time analysis. Subjects completed surveys about blade preferences before and after completing the series of intubations.
Total laryngoscopy time and first attempt success in less than 30 s.
There was no difference in total laryngoscopy time (median 23.7 vs 20.6 s) or first attempt success in <30 s (67.3% vs 69.1%) between the size-0 and size-00 blades. Differences were noted between the same size blades made by different manufacturers. Among subjects expressing a prestudy blade size preference, there was no difference in laryngoscopy time or first attempt success between blades. Regardless of blade size, subjects were less successful with the first blade in the randomised sequence.
Our findings support the Neonatal Resuscitation Program recommendation identifying the size-00 blade as optional equipment. Operators need to be aware of design variations between manufacturers and they may benefit from 'just-in-time' training with a manikin prior to intubating a live patient.
确定使用0号或00号米勒喉镜叶片对极低出生体重(ELBW)新生儿进行气管插管是否更成功。
随机交叉模拟研究。
模拟新生儿重症监护病房环境。
新生儿科医生和执业护士(n = 55)。
受试者使用来自两个不同制造商的0号米勒叶片和00号米勒叶片,在高保真ELBW人体模型上连续进行四次插管。插管顺序是随机的。插管过程被记录下来并进行时间分析评分。受试者在完成一系列插管前后完成关于叶片偏好的调查。
总喉镜检查时间和首次尝试在30秒内成功的情况。
0号和00号叶片在总喉镜检查时间(中位数23.7秒对20.6秒)或首次尝试在<30秒内成功的情况(67.3%对69.1%)方面没有差异。不同制造商生产的相同尺寸叶片之间存在差异。在表达研究前叶片尺寸偏好的受试者中,不同叶片在喉镜检查时间或首次尝试成功方面没有差异。无论叶片尺寸如何,受试者在随机序列中使用第一个叶片时成功率较低。
我们的研究结果支持新生儿复苏计划将00号叶片确定为可选设备的建议。操作人员需要了解不同制造商之间的设计差异,并且在对活体患者进行插管之前,他们可能会从使用人体模型的“即时”培训中受益。