Suppr超能文献

肺动脉高压患者居家药物转换方法的安全性与可行性审计:一项观察性研究

Safety and feasibility audit of a home-based drug-transitioning approach for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: an observational study.

作者信息

Dawson A, Reddecliffe S, Coghlan C, Schreiber B E, Coghlan J G

机构信息

Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Oct;17(7):612-618. doi: 10.1177/1474515118769534. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Newer endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) used to treat patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are associated with fewer drug-drug interactions than bosentan and require less monitoring. This, combined with a pharmacokinetic basis for improved efficacy, means there may be a clinical rationale for changing therapies. However, this can be challenging and few data on its safety in patients with PAH are available.

AIMS

At the Royal Free Hospital in London, UK, home-based medication transitioning has been standard practice since 2009 to avoid unnecessary hospital visits for patients, unless there is a clinical imperative. In this audit of standard practice we evaluated the consequences of adopting such a strategy when transitioning PAH patients between ERA therapies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a Clinical Nurse Specialist-led, home-based transitioning strategy, 92 patients with PAH were transitioned from bosentan to macitentan or ambrisentan. Observational data were analysed retrospectively. The majority of patients were female with PAH associated with connective tissue disease and their ERA was changed in the hope of improving efficacy. The process was well tolerated with no adverse events associated with the process. Seventeen patients died during the study (macitentan, n = 5; ambrisentan, n = 12). None of the deaths was considered related to ERA treatment. The majority of patients remained clinically stable, based on WHO functional class and exercise capacity.

CONCLUSION

An established home-based transitioning strategy can be adopted safely for patients with PAH changing ERA therapies. Most patients remained stable and the therapy change was well tolerated.

摘要

背景

用于治疗肺动脉高压(PAH)患者的新型内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERA)与波生坦相比,药物相互作用较少,且所需监测较少。这一点,再加上其疗效改善的药代动力学基础,意味着可能存在改变治疗方法的临床依据。然而,这可能具有挑战性,且关于其在PAH患者中的安全性的数据很少。

目的

在英国伦敦的皇家自由医院,自2009年以来,以家庭为基础的药物转换一直是标准做法,以避免患者不必要的医院就诊,除非有临床需要。在这项对标准做法的审核中,我们评估了在PAH患者的ERA治疗之间转换时采用这种策略的后果。

方法与结果

采用由临床护士专家主导的以家庭为基础的转换策略,92例PAH患者从波生坦转换为马昔腾坦或安立生坦。对观察数据进行回顾性分析。大多数患者为女性,PAH与结缔组织病相关,改变其ERA是为了提高疗效。该过程耐受性良好,未出现与该过程相关的不良事件。17例患者在研究期间死亡(马昔腾坦组5例;安立生坦组12例)。所有死亡均不被认为与ERA治疗有关。根据世界卫生组织功能分级和运动能力,大多数患者保持临床稳定。

结论

对于正在改变ERA治疗的PAH患者,可以安全地采用既定的以家庭为基础的转换策略。大多数患者保持稳定,治疗改变耐受性良好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验