Eric Jonasch, Rebecca S. Slack, Summer Stovall, Donna Juarez, Troy R. Gilchrist, Lisa Pruitt, and Nizar M. Tannir, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Elshad Hasanov, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX; Daniel M. Geynisman and Elizabeth R. Plimack, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; W. Kimryn Rathmell, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; and Moshe C. Ornstein and Brian I. Rini, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;36(16):1588-1593. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.1485. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
Purpose Standard frontline treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma currently includes sunitinib. A barrier to long-term treatment with sunitinib includes the development of significant adverse effects, including diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), and fatigue. This trial assessed the effect of an alternate 2 weeks on, 1 week off (2/1) schedule of sunitinib on toxicity and efficacy in previously untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods Patients started with oral administration of 50 mg sunitinib on a 2/1 schedule and underwent schedule and dose alterations if toxicity developed. The primary end point was < 15% grade ≥ 3 fatigue, diarrhea, or HFS. With 60 patients, the upper bound of the CI would fall below the published 4/2 schedule grade ≥ 3 toxicity rate of 25% to 30%. Results Fifty-nine patients were treated between August 2014 and March 2016. Seventy-seven percent were intermediate or poor risk per Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center criteria. With a median follow-up of 17 months, 25% of patients experienced grade 3 fatigue, HFS, or diarrhea; 37% required a dose reduction, and 10% discontinued because of toxicity. The overall response rate was 57%, median progression-free survival was 13.7 months, and median overall survival was not reached. At 12 weeks, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores dropped between 0% and 10% from baseline, with less reduction in patients who continued treatment longer. Conclusion The primary end point of decreased grade 3 toxicity was not met; however, treatment with a 2/1 sunitinib schedule is associated with a lack of grade 4 toxicity, a low patient discontinuation rate, and high efficacy.
目前转移性肾细胞癌患者的标准一线治疗包括舒尼替尼。舒尼替尼长期治疗的障碍包括严重不良反应的发展,包括腹泻、手足综合征(HFS)和疲劳。本试验评估了替他 2 周方案(2/1)对既往未接受转移性肾细胞癌治疗的患者的毒性和疗效的影响。
患者开始服用舒尼替尼,50mg/次,2/1 方案,若出现毒性,则调整方案和剂量。主要终点为<15%的 3 级及以上疲劳、腹泻或 HFS。入组 60 例患者后,CI 的上限将低于已发表的 4/2 方案的 30%。
59 例患者于 2014 年 8 月至 2016 年 3 月接受治疗。根据 Memorial Sloan Kettering 癌症中心标准,77%的患者为中危或高危。中位随访 17 个月,25%的患者出现 3 级疲劳、HFS 或腹泻;37%需要减少剂量,10%因毒性而停药。总缓解率为 57%,中位无进展生存期为 13.7 个月,中位总生存期未达到。在 12 周时,癌症治疗功能评估-一般评分(Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores)较基线下降 0%至 10%,继续治疗时间较长的患者评分下降幅度较小。
未达到降低 3 级毒性的主要终点;然而,2/1 舒尼替尼方案与 4 级毒性低、患者停药率低和高疗效相关。