Suppr超能文献

在转移性肾细胞癌患者中,采用4/2方案与2/1方案给予舒尼替尼的耐受性和疗效:一项前瞻性随机多中心埃及研究。

Tolerability and outcome of sunitinib by giving 4/2 schedule versus 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized multi-centric Egyptian study.

作者信息

Abdelaziz Lobna A, Taha Heba F, Ali Magid M, Abdelgawad Marwa I, Elwan Amira

机构信息

Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Medical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

出版信息

Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2020;24(4):221-228. doi: 10.5114/wo.2020.102802. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sunitinib is a standard of care first line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Sunitinib standard dose is 50 mg once daily for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks' off (4/2 schedule). Long-term and high exposure to this medication lead to severe adverse events (AEs); therefore, this trial was done to find the best schedule which gives the best outcome with minimal toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups, then received 50 mg/day of sunitinib. Group 1 (40 patients) received sunitinib for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks off (4/2 schedule) while 30 patients were admitted to group 2 with 2 weeks on and 1 week off (2/1 schedule).

RESULTS

All patients (100%) had significantly higher AEs on schedule 4/2 vs. 73.3% on schedule 2/1 ( = 0.001). Furthermore, the grade 3 AEs on schedule 2/1 were significantly lower than those on schedule 4/2 (26.7% vs. 82.5%) respectively ( = 0.001), such as fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, hand foot syndrome (HFS) and mucositis. Progression-free survival (PFS) rate was significantly higher in 2/1 schedule (60.9% vs. 38.6%) than in 4/2 schedule ( < 0.008). Multivariate analysis suggested that: age > 60 years, poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category, tumor size > 10 cm and treatment schedule (group 1) were poor prognostic factors of PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supported the use of 2/1 schedule of sunitinib in patients with metastatic RCC because of lower toxicity profile and better efficacy with improved PFS in comparison to 4/2 schedule.

摘要

引言

舒尼替尼是转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)患者护理的一线标准治疗药物。舒尼替尼的标准剂量为每日50毫克,连续服用4周,随后停药2周(4/2给药方案)。长期高剂量使用该药物会导致严重不良事件(AE);因此,开展本试验以寻找能在毒性最小的情况下产生最佳疗效的最佳给药方案。

材料与方法

70例患者被随机分为2组,然后接受每日50毫克的舒尼替尼治疗。第1组(40例患者)接受舒尼替尼连续治疗4周,随后停药2周(4/2给药方案),而30例患者被纳入第2组,采用服药2周、停药1周(2/1给药方案)。

结果

所有患者(100%)在4/2给药方案下的不良事件显著高于2/1给药方案下的(73.3%)(P = 0.001)。此外,2/1给药方案下的3级不良事件显著低于4/2给药方案下的(分别为26.7%对82.5%)(P = 0.001),如疲劳、腹泻、高血压、手足综合征(HFS)和黏膜炎。2/1给药方案的无进展生存期(PFS)率(60.9%对38.6%)显著高于4/2给药方案(P < 0.008)。多因素分析表明:年龄>60岁、国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)风险分类差、肿瘤大小>10厘米和治疗方案(第1组)是PFS的不良预后因素。

结论

我们的研究支持在转移性RCC患者中使用舒尼替尼的2/1给药方案,因为与4/2给药方案相比,其毒性较低且疗效更好,PFS有所改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2361/7836283/182e59497006/WO-24-43068-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验