• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北安纳托利亚断层大地震之间的应变积累率常数。

Constant strain accumulation rate between major earthquakes on the North Anatolian Fault.

机构信息

COMET, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.

COMET, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 11;9(1):1392. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03739-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-03739-2
PMID:29643366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5895838/
Abstract

Earthquakes are caused by the release of tectonic strain accumulated between events. Recent advances in satellite geodesy mean we can now measure this interseismic strain accumulation with a high degree of accuracy. But it remains unclear how to interpret short-term geodetic observations, measured over decades, when estimating the seismic hazard of faults accumulating strain over centuries. Here, we show that strain accumulation rates calculated from geodetic measurements around a major transform fault are constant for its entire 250-year interseismic period, except in the ~10 years following an earthquake. The shear strain rate history requires a weak fault zone embedded within a strong lower crust with viscosity greater than ~10 Pa s. The results support the notion that short-term geodetic observations can directly contribute to long-term seismic hazard assessment and suggest that lower-crustal viscosities derived from postseismic studies are not representative of the lower crust at all spatial and temporal scales.

摘要

地震是由构造应变在事件之间积累释放引起的。卫星大地测量学的最新进展意味着我们现在可以高精度地测量这种震间应变积累。但是,当估计在数百年内积累应变的断层的地震危险时,如何解释短期大地测量观测值(在几十年内测量)仍然不清楚。在这里,我们表明,从主要转换断层周围的大地测量测量计算得出的应变积累率在其整个 250 年的震间期间是恒定的,除了在地震后的大约 10 年。剪切应变率历史需要一个弱的断层带嵌入在具有大于约 10 Pa s 的粘度的强下地壳中。结果支持了这样的观点,即短期大地测量观测值可以直接有助于长期地震危险评估,并表明从震后研究中得出的下地壳粘度根本不能代表所有空间和时间尺度的下地壳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78e/5895838/090f8efed715/41467_2018_3739_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78e/5895838/8e4af7aeac48/41467_2018_3739_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78e/5895838/973434d0cef4/41467_2018_3739_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78e/5895838/793d41a67fbc/41467_2018_3739_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78e/5895838/090f8efed715/41467_2018_3739_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78e/5895838/8e4af7aeac48/41467_2018_3739_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78e/5895838/973434d0cef4/41467_2018_3739_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78e/5895838/793d41a67fbc/41467_2018_3739_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c78e/5895838/090f8efed715/41467_2018_3739_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Constant strain accumulation rate between major earthquakes on the North Anatolian Fault.北安纳托利亚断层大地震之间的应变积累率常数。
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 11;9(1):1392. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03739-2.
2
Empirical evidence for multi-decadal transients affecting geodetic velocity fields and derived seismicity forecasts in Italy.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19941. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70816-6.
3
A mechanical model for intraplate earthquakes: application to the new madrid seismic zone.板内地震的力学模型:应用于新马德里地震带
Science. 2000 Sep 29;289(5488):2329-32. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5488.2329.
4
Lower-crustal rheology and thermal gradient in the Taiwan orogenic belt illuminated by the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake.1999年集集地震揭示的台湾造山带地壳下部流变学与热梯度
Sci Adv. 2019 Feb 27;5(2):eaav3287. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav3287. eCollection 2019 Feb.
5
Surface Deformation Analysis of the Wider Zagreb Area (Croatia) with Focus on the Kašina Fault, Investigated with Small Baseline InSAR Observations.用小基线干涉雷达观测研究卡申断层,分析克罗地亚萨格勒布地区(克罗地亚)的地表形变。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Nov 7;19(22):4857. doi: 10.3390/s19224857.
6
Potential for a large earthquake near Los Angeles inferred from the 2014 La Habra earthquake.从2014年拉哈布拉地震推断洛杉矶附近发生大地震的可能性。
Earth Space Sci. 2015 Sep;2(9):378-385. doi: 10.1002/2015EA000113. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
7
Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San Andreas fault system.圣安德烈亚斯断层系统南部的震间应变积累与地震潜力
Nature. 2006 Jun 22;441(7096):968-71. doi: 10.1038/nature04797.
8
Interseismic strain build-up on the submarine North Anatolian Fault offshore Istanbul.伊斯坦布尔近海的北安纳托利亚断层海下的地震间应变积累。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 8;10(1):3006. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11016-z.
9
Orogen-scale uplift in the central Italian Apennines drives episodic behaviour of earthquake faults.意大利亚平宁山脉中部的造山隆升驱动地震断层的幕式活动。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 21;7:44858. doi: 10.1038/srep44858.
10
Stress loading history of earthquake faults influenced by fault/shear zone geometry and Coulomb pre-stress.受断层/剪切带几何形状和库仑预应力影响的地震断层应力加载历史。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 29;10(1):12724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69681-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal and spatial earthquake clustering revealed through comparison of millennial strain-rates from Cl cosmogenic exposure dating and decadal GPS strain-rate.通过比较来自氯宇宙成因暴露测年的千年应变率和十年GPS应变率揭示的时空地震聚类。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 2;11(1):23320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02131-3.
2
Lower-crustal rheology and thermal gradient in the Taiwan orogenic belt illuminated by the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake.1999年集集地震揭示的台湾造山带地壳下部流变学与热梯度
Sci Adv. 2019 Feb 27;5(2):eaav3287. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav3287. eCollection 2019 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of space-based observation in understanding and responding to active tectonics and earthquakes.基于太空观测在理解和应对活动构造与地震中的作用。
Nat Commun. 2016 Dec 22;7:13844. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13844.
2
Deeper penetration of large earthquakes on seismically quiescent faults.大地震在地震静止断层中更深的穿透。
Science. 2016 Jun 10;352(6291):1293-7. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1496.
3
Under the hood of the earthquake machine: toward predictive modeling of the seismic cycle.地震机器的内部机制:地震周期的预测模型研究。
Science. 2012 May 11;336(6082):707-10. doi: 10.1126/science.1218796.