Kim Tae-Ho, Hwang Byoung-Ha
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitaion Science, Daegu University: 201 Daegudae-ro, Jillyang, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, Republic of Korea.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Dec;29(12):2172-2175. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.2172. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
[Purpose] This study examines how difference in sandy ground between firm ground influences the effects of gait training in patients with chronic stroke. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 28 patients with chronic stroke were evenly divided into experimental and control groups. Initial evaluation of the subjects was conducted by Timed Up & Go (TUG) and 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT). Each patient in both groups received daily, 30-minute gait training on sandy ground and firm ground, five times each week, for a total of six weeks, after which reevaluation was conducted. [Results] In TUG, both groups showed significant improvement after the intervention. In 6MWT, only the experimental group achieved significantly increased distance after the intervention. However, there was no between-group difference. Improvement in dynamic balancing ability depends on repeated gait training rather than differences in the ground environment. However, gait endurance showed a difference depending on the types of ground, regardless of repeated gait training. [Conclusion] This can be attributed to the fact that gait training on sand requires use of more diverse muscles. Hence, we can confirm the potential of sand as a new material for training ground when attempting to improve walking ability, particularly gait endurance, among patients with chronic stroke.
[目的] 本研究探讨坚实地面与沙地之间的差异如何影响慢性中风患者步态训练的效果。[对象与方法] 总共28例慢性中风患者被平均分为实验组和对照组。通过计时起立行走测试(TUG)和6分钟步行测试(6MWT)对受试者进行初始评估。两组中的每位患者均在沙地和坚实地面上接受每日30分钟的步态训练,每周5次,共六周,之后进行重新评估。[结果] 在TUG测试中,两组在干预后均显示出显著改善。在6MWT测试中,只有实验组在干预后实现了行走距离的显著增加。然而,两组之间没有差异。动态平衡能力的改善取决于重复的步态训练,而非地面环境的差异。然而,无论重复的步态训练如何,步态耐力根据地面类型表现出差异。[结论] 这可以归因于在沙地进行步态训练需要使用更多种类的肌肉。因此,当试图改善慢性中风患者的行走能力,特别是步态耐力时,我们可以确认沙地作为训练场地新材料的潜力。