Ramin Shahrokh, Sangin Abadi Azad, Doroodgar Farideh, Esmaeili Mehrdad, Niazi Faizollah, Niazi Sana, Alinia Cyrus, Golestani Yaser, Taj Abadi Reza
Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2018 Spring;7(1):32-39.
This study was performed to evaluate the visual, refractive, and aberration measurement results of 2 implants, including Intacs Intracorneal Ring Segments (ICRS) and phakic Toric Implantable Collamer Lens (TICL), in patients with moderate Keratoconus (KCN). In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 30 patients with KCN with a mean age of 29.83 years were included in 2 groups, including the Intacs Intracorneal Ring Segments (ICRS) group and the phakic Toric Implantable Collamer Lens (TICL) group. Preoperative data as well as 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year follow-up data after the operation were collected and analyzed with the SPSS software (ver. 23.0, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL), using the paired t-test, independent t-test, repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and one-way ANOVA. This study included 30 patients with KCN with a mean age of 29.83 years and range of 25 to 35 years, including 17 males with a mean age of 30.11 years and 13 female with a mean age of 29.25 years. Except for preoperative Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA), Spherical Equivalent (SE) and astigmatism, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups regarding other variables. The TICL group had a significantly better UCDVA and Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in all post-operative follow-ups, and SE and astigmatism values were significantly lower in all post-operative follow-ups when compared with the ICRS group. There was a significant reduction in corneal and total coma as well as internal trefoil aberrations (P<0.01, P<0.01, and P=0.014, respectively) in the ICRS group, and TICL led to a significant reduction in internal trefoil aberration with P<0.03. Comparison of the 2 groups revealed a significant difference in corneal spherical (P<0.01) and total coma (P=0.02) aberrations and no significant differences in other HOA. Both ICRS and TICL are useful in patients with moderate KCN. However, TICL appears to have more stable and predictable vision results.
本研究旨在评估2种植入物,即角膜基质环(Intacs角膜内环片,ICRS)和有晶状体眼散光型可植入胶原晶状体(TICL),在中度圆锥角膜(KCN)患者中的视力、屈光和像差测量结果。在这项回顾性横断面研究中,30例平均年龄为29.83岁的KCN患者被纳入2组,即ICRS组和TICL组。收集术前数据以及术后6个月、1年、2年、3年和4年的随访数据,并使用SPSS软件(版本23.0,SPSS公司,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)进行分析,采用配对t检验、独立t检验、重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和单因素ANOVA。本研究纳入了30例平均年龄为29.83岁、年龄范围在25至35岁之间的KCN患者,其中包括17例平均年龄为30.11岁的男性和13例平均年龄为29.25岁的女性。除术前未矫正远视力(UCDVA)、等效球镜度(SE)和散光外,两组在其他变量方面存在显著差异。在所有术后随访中,TICL组的UCDVA和最佳矫正远视力(BCDVA)明显更好,与ICRS组相比,所有术后随访中的SE和散光值明显更低。ICRS组的角膜和总彗差以及内部三叶草像差均显著降低(分别为P<0.01、P<0.01和P=0.014),TICL导致内部三叶草像差显著降低,P<0.03。两组比较显示,角膜球差(P<0.01)和总彗差(P=0.02)存在显著差异,而其他高阶像差无显著差异。ICRS和TICL对中度KCN患者均有用。然而,TICL似乎具有更稳定和可预测的视力结果。