Ekmekci Perihan Elif, Arda Berna
Department of History of Medicine and Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Söğütözü, Söğütözü Cd. 43, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of History of Medicine and Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Emniyet Mahallesi, Dögol Cd. 6A, Yenimahalle/Ankara, Turkey.
Cultura (Iasi). 2017;14(2):159-172.
Interventions in medicine require multicenter clinical trials on a large rather than limited number of subjects from various genetic and cultural backgrounds. International guidelines to protect the rights and well-being of human subjects involved in clinical trials are criticized for the priority they place on Western cultural values. These discussions become manifest especially with regard to the content and methodology of the informed consent procedure. The ethical dilemma emerges from the argument that there are fundamental differences about the concept of respect for the autonomy of individuals in different cultures and religions. Some communities prioritize the consent of community leaders or the head of family - usually men - over the voluntary and free consent of the individual. The aim of this work is to discuss this ethical dilemma to determine a base for a consensus that satisfies the sensibilities of different cultures without damaging the rights and autonomy of human subjects.
医学干预需要在大量而非有限数量的、来自不同遗传和文化背景的受试者身上进行多中心临床试验。保护参与临床试验的人类受试者的权利和福祉的国际准则因过于重视西方文化价值观而受到批评。这些讨论尤其在知情同意程序的内容和方法方面表现得很明显。伦理困境源于这样一种观点,即不同文化和宗教在尊重个人自主性的概念上存在根本差异。一些社区将社区领袖或家庭户主(通常是男性)的同意置于个人的自愿和自由同意之上。这项工作的目的是讨论这一伦理困境,以确定一个共识基础,既能满足不同文化的敏感性,又不损害人类受试者的权利和自主性。