Walker J J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Sep;74 Suppl 1:S25-S30. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00462-3.
The clinical management of women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and endometriosis involves important issues that exist at the interface between these two conditions.
To address these issues, an interactive session was convened to discuss an empiric algorithmic protocol for the clinical management of CPP and endometriosis presented during the Takeda-sponsored session as part of the XVI FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics and to monitor the audience response to this approach.
Approximately one-third of the audience responded that they would definitely try this method, approximately 18% were already using it, and approximately 21% would be fairly likely to try it. Thirty percent of the audience was not convinced that the empiric approach is the best management strategy.
The advantages of this management strategy should be carefully considered, and discussed with colleagues who do think it is the reasonable treatment approach in selected cases.
慢性盆腔疼痛（CPP）合并子宫内膜异位症女性的临床管理涉及这两种病症之间的重要问题。
为解决这些问题，召开了一次互动会议，讨论在武田制药赞助的会议期间作为第十六届国际妇产科联合会（FIGO）世界妇产科大会一部分所提出的CPP合并子宫内膜异位症临床管理的经验性算法方案，并监测听众对该方法的反应。
约三分之一的听众表示肯定会尝试这种方法，约18%的听众已经在使用，约21%的听众相当有可能尝试。30%的听众不相信经验性方法是最佳管理策略。
应仔细考虑这种管理策略的优点，并与那些确实认为在特定病例中这是合理治疗方法的同事进行讨论。
