Suppr超能文献

慢推注小剂量氯胺酮相较于静脉推注可减少烦人的副作用:一项双盲、双模拟、随机对照试验。

Slow Infusion of Low-dose Ketamine Reduces Bothersome Side Effects Compared to Intravenous Push: A Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital-Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;25(9):1048-1052. doi: 10.1111/acem.13428. Epub 2018 May 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared the analgesic efficacy and incidence of side effects when low-dose (0.3 mg/kg) ketamine (LDK) is administered as a slow infusion (SI) over 15 minutes versus an intravenous push (IVP) over 1 minute.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial of adult ED patients presenting with moderate to severe pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] score ≥ 5). Patients received 0.3 mg/kg ketamine administered either as a SI or a IVP. Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing any psychoperceptual side effect over 60 minutes. A secondary outcome was incidence of moderate or greater psychoperceptual side effects. Additional outcomes included reduction in pain NRS scores at 60 minutes and percent maximum summed pain intensity difference (%SPID).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine participants completed the study. A total of 86.2% of the IVP arm and 70.0% of the SI arm experienced any side effect (difference = 16.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -5.4 to 37.8). We found a large reduction in moderate or greater psychoperceptual side effects with SI administration-75.9% reported moderate or greater side effects versus 43.4% in the SI arm (difference = 32.5%, 95% CI = 7.9 to 57.1). Additionally, the IVP arm experienced more hallucinations (n = 8, 27.6%) than the SI arm (SI n = 2, 6.7%, difference = 20.9%, 95% CI = 1.8 to 43.4). We found no significant differences in analgesic efficacy. At 60 minutes, the mean %SPID values in the IVP and SI arms were 39.9 and 33.5%, respectively, with a difference of 6.5% (95% CI = -5.8 to 18.7).

CONCLUSION

Most patients who are administered LDK experience a psychoperceptual side effect regardless of administration via SI or IVP. However, patients receiving LDK as a SI reported significantly fewer moderate or greater psychoperceptual side effects and hallucinations with equivalent analgesia.

摘要

目的

我们比较了小剂量(0.3mg/kg)氯胺酮(LDK)以 15 分钟缓慢输注(SI)与 1 分钟静脉推注(IVP)方式给药时的镇痛效果和不良反应发生率。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照的研究,纳入了就诊于急诊科、伴有中重度疼痛(数字评分量表[NRS]评分≥5)的成年患者。患者接受 0.3mg/kg 氯胺酮,分别以 SI 或 IVP 方式给药。主要结局为 60 分钟内出现任何精神感觉不良反应的患者比例。次要结局为出现中重度精神感觉不良反应的发生率。其他结局包括 60 分钟时疼痛 NRS 评分的降低以及最大总和疼痛强度差值的百分比(%SPID)。

结果

59 名患者完成了研究。IVP 组和 SI 组分别有 86.2%和 70.0%的患者出现任何不良反应(差异=16.2%,95%置信区间[CI]:-5.4 至 37.8)。我们发现 SI 给药可显著减少中重度精神感觉不良反应-75.9%的患者报告出现中重度不良反应,而 SI 组为 43.4%(差异=32.5%,95%CI:7.9 至 57.1)。此外,IVP 组出现幻觉的患者更多(8 例,27.6%),而 SI 组为 2 例(6.7%)(差异=20.9%,95%CI:1.8 至 43.4)。我们未发现镇痛效果的显著差异。在 60 分钟时,IVP 和 SI 组的平均%SPID 值分别为 39.9%和 33.5%,差异为 6.5%(95%CI:-5.8 至 18.7)。

结论

无论采用 SI 还是 IVP 方式给予 LDK,大多数患者都会出现精神感觉不良反应。但接受 SI 给予 LDK 的患者报告出现中重度精神感觉不良反应和幻觉的比例显著更低,而镇痛效果相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验