• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 Medicare Part D 下降低特殊药物使用的自付费用障碍:解决“太多太快”的问题。

Reducing out-of-pocket cost barriers to specialty drug use under Medicare Part D: addressing the problem of "too much too soon".

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, 1223 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2017 Mar;23(3 Suppl):S39-S45.

PMID:29648739
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Medicare Part D specialty drug users not qualifying for low-income subsidies (non-LIS beneficiaries) face high and variable cost sharing during the calendar year. We examined their out-of-pocket (OOP) cost patterns under the existing Part D cost-sharing policies and proposed changes to these policies.

METHODS

Using 100% Medicare claims data from 2012, we examined mean annual and monthly OOP drug costs for Medicare Part D patients who were full-year users of Part D specialty drugs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 1063), multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 2256), or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (n = 1135) under existing policy. Using the same data, we simulated costs under both proposed Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) policy recommendations and our own recommendations.

RESULTS

In 2012, our sample faced mean annual cumulative OOP drug costs (for all medications) of $3949 (RA), $5238 (MS), and $6322 (CML). Mean OOP costs were $977 (RA), $1613 (MS), and $2456 (CML) in January alone. A substantial proportion of total annual OOP prescription spending also occurred during the catastrophic coverage phase (RA: $1229 [31%]; MS: $2456 [47%]; CML: $3546 [56%]). Under proposed MedPAC changes, patients would have faced maximum annual OOP spending of $4700, but mean OOP costs in January and February would have been higher compared with the existing policy. Under our proposed strategy, OOP costs would have been spread evenly over 12 months (≤$392 per month). The potential incremental costs of our proposed strategy would have been $23.55 per non-LIS Part D beneficiary per year.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing Part D cost-sharing structure creates a substantial financial burden for specialty drug users, especially early in the year. Implementing both annual and monthly OOP maximum spending limits would result in lower, more consistent OOP costs, potentially increasing patients' ability to access treatments for life-threatening, chronic, and rare diseases.

摘要

目的

不符合低收入补贴资格的医疗保险计划 D 部分专科药物使用者(非 LIS 受惠人)在日历年期间面临高昂且可变的自付费用。我们研究了他们在现行医疗保险计划 D 部分自付费用政策下的自付(OOP)费用模式,并提出了对这些政策的修改建议。

方法

使用 2012 年 100%的医疗保险索赔数据,我们研究了全年使用医疗保险计划 D 部分治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)(n = 1063)、多发性硬化症(MS)(n = 2256)或慢性髓性白血病(CML)(n = 1135)的专科药物的医疗保险计划 D 患者的年度和月度 OOP 药物平均成本。使用相同的数据,我们模拟了医疗保险支付咨询委员会(MedPAC)建议的现行政策和我们自己的建议下的成本。

结果

2012 年,我们的样本面临着 3949 美元(RA)、5238 美元(MS)和 6322 美元(CML)的年度累计 OOP 药物费用(所有药物)。仅在 1 月份,OOP 费用就分别达到了 977 美元(RA)、1613 美元(MS)和 2456 美元(CML)。总年度 OOP 处方药支出的很大一部分也发生在灾难性保险覆盖阶段(RA:1229 美元[31%];MS:2456 美元[47%];CML:3546 美元[56%])。根据拟议的 MedPAC 变更,患者将面临最高 4700 美元的年度 OOP 支出,但与现行政策相比,1 月和 2 月的 OOP 费用将更高。根据我们提出的策略,OOP 费用将在 12 个月内平均分摊(≤每月 392 美元)。我们提出的策略的潜在增量成本将是每位非 LIS 医疗保险计划 D 受益人的每年 23.55 美元。

结论

现行的医疗保险计划 D 部分自付费用结构给专科药物使用者带来了巨大的经济负担,尤其是在年初。实施年度和月度 OOP 最高支出限制将导致更低、更一致的 OOP 费用,这可能会提高患者获得危及生命、慢性和罕见疾病治疗的能力。

相似文献

1
Reducing out-of-pocket cost barriers to specialty drug use under Medicare Part D: addressing the problem of "too much too soon".在 Medicare Part D 下降低特殊药物使用的自付费用障碍:解决“太多太快”的问题。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Mar;23(3 Suppl):S39-S45.
2
Financial Burden for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Enrolled in Medicare Part D Taking Targeted Oral Anticancer Medications.医疗保险计划 D 部分中接受靶向口服抗癌药物治疗的慢性髓性白血病患者的经济负担。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Feb;13(2):e152-e162. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.014639. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
Effects of an out-of-pocket maximum in Medicare Part D.医疗保险处方药部分自付最高额的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Feb 1;28(2):e55-e62. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88828.
4
Sociodemographic and spending characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries taking prescription drugs subject to price negotiations.接受受价格谈判约束的处方药的医疗保险受益人在社会人口统计学和支出特征方面的情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Mar 1;30(3):269-278. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.23153. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
5
Paying for Drugs After the Medicare Part D Beneficiary Reaches the Catastrophic Limit: Lessons on Cost Sharing from Other US Policy Partnerships Between Government and Commercial Industry.医疗保险 D 部分受益人达到灾难性限额后支付药品费用:政府与商业行业之间其他美国政策伙伴关系在费用分担方面的经验教训。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Dec;16(6):753-763. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0417-3.
6
Use and Spending for Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis Among US Medicare Beneficiaries.美国医疗保险受益人群中用于类风湿关节炎的生物性改善病情抗风湿药物的使用情况及支出
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Sep;67(9):1210-1218. doi: 10.1002/acr.22580.
7
Comparing patient OOP spending for specialty drugs in Medicare Part D and employer-sponsored insurance.比较 Medicare Part D 和雇主赞助保险中特种药物的患者自付费用。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Sep;26(9):388-394. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.88489.
8
Analysis of Proposed Medicare Part B to Part D Shift With Associated Changes in Total Spending and Patient Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs.分析拟议的医疗保险 B 部分到 D 部分的转变以及处方药总支出和患者自付费用的相关变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):374-380. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6417.
9
Specialty Tier-Level Cost Sharing and Biologic Agent Use in the Medicare Part D Initial Coverage Period Among Beneficiaries With Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿性关节炎患者在医疗保险D部分初始承保期内的专科层级费用分担与生物制剂使用情况
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Nov;68(11):1624-1630. doi: 10.1002/acr.22880.
10
High cost sharing and specialty drug initiation under Medicare Part D: a case study in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.医疗保险D部分下的高额费用分担与专科药物起始治疗:新诊断慢性髓性白血病患者的案例研究
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Mar;22(4 Suppl):s78-86.

引用本文的文献

1
Inflation Reduction Act Provisions and Medicare Part D Out-of-Pocket Costs for Specialty Drugs.《降低通胀法案》条款与医疗保险D部分特殊药物的自付费用
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 May 2;6(5):e251387. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1387.
2
Assessing the feasibility and likelihood of policy options to lower specialty drug costs.评估降低专科药物成本的政策选择的可行性和可能性。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Sep 27;2(10):qxae118. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae118. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Comparative policy analysis of national rare disease funding policies in Australia, Singapore, South Korea, the United Kingdom and the United States: a scoping review.
澳大利亚、新加坡、韩国、英国和美国国家罕见病资助政策的比较政策分析:一项范围综述
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00519-1.
4
Healthcare Cost Burden and Self-Reported Frequency of Depressive/Anxious Feelings in Older Adults.老年人的医疗费用负担与抑郁/焦虑情绪的自述频率。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2024 Apr;67(3):349-368. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2024.2326683. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
Comparison of Out-of-Pocket Spending on Ultra-Expensive Drugs in Medicare Part D vs Commercial Insurance.医疗保险部分 D 与商业保险中超昂贵药物自付费用比较。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 May 5;4(5):e231090. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1090.
6
Characterizing patient assistance program use and patient responsiveness to specialty drug price for multiple sclerosis in a mid-size integrated health system.描述在一个中等规模的综合性医疗体系中,多发性硬化症患者援助计划的使用情况和患者对 specialty drug 价格的反应。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jun;27(6):732-742. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.6.732.
7
Review of Current Policy Strategies to Reduce US Cancer Drug Costs.降低美国癌症药物成本的现行政策策略综述。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;38(4):372-379. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01628. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
8
Association of high cost sharing and targeted therapy initiation among elderly Medicare patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.老年医疗保险患者转移性肾细胞癌的高成本分担与靶向治疗起始的关联。
Cancer Med. 2018 Jan;7(1):75-86. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1262. Epub 2017 Dec 1.