a California Air Resources Board , Sacramento , CA , USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2018 Sep;68(9):969-987. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2018.1460637. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
Remote sensing devices have been used for decades to measure gaseous emissions from individual vehicles at the roadside. Systems have also been developed that entrain diluted exhaust and can also measure particulate matter (PM) emissions. In 2015, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) reported that 8% of in-field diesel particulate filters (DPF) on heavy-duty (HD) vehicles were malfunctioning and emitted about 70% of total diesel PM emissions from the DPF-equipped fleet. A new high-emitter problem in the heavy-duty vehicle fleet had emerged. Roadside exhaust plume measurements reflect a snapshot of real-world operation, typically lasting several seconds. In order to relate roadside plume measurements to laboratory emission tests, we analyzed carbon dioxide (CO), oxides of nitrogen (NO), and PM emissions collected from four HD vehicles during several driving cycles on a chassis dynamometer. We examined the fuel-based emission factors corresponding to possible exceedances of emission standards as a function of vehicle power. Our analysis suggests that a typical HD vehicle will exceed the model year (MY) 2010 emission standards (of 0.2 g NO/bhp-hr and 0.01 g PM/bhp-hr) by three times when fuel-based emission factors are 9.3 g NO/kg fuel and 0.11 g PM/kg using the roadside plume measurement approach. Reported limits correspond to 99% confidence levels, which were calculated using the detection uncertainty of emissions analyzers, accuracy of vehicle power calculations, and actual emissions variability of fixed operational parameters. The PM threshold was determined for acceleration events between 0.47 and 1.4 mph/sec only, and the NO threshold was derived from measurements where after-treatment temperature was above 200°C. Anticipating a growing interest in real-world driving emissions, widespread implementation of roadside exhaust plume measurements as a compliment to in-use vehicle programs may benefit from expanding this analysis to a larger sample of in-use HD vehicles.
Regulatory agencies, civil society, and the public at large have a growing interest in vehicle emission compliance in the real world. Leveraging roadside plume measurements to identify vehicles with malfunctioning emission control systems is emerging as a viable new and useful method to assess in-use performance. This work proposes fuel-based emission factor thresholds for PM and NOx that signify exceedances of emission standards on a work-specific basis by analyzing real-time emissions in the laboratory. These thresholds could be used to prescreen vehicles before roadside enforcement inspection or other inquiry, enhance and further develop emission inventories, and potentially develop new requirements for heavy-duty inspection and maintenance (I/M) programs, including but not limited to identifying vehicles for further testing.
几十年来,遥感设备一直被用于测量路边车辆的气态排放物。还开发了一些系统,可以夹带稀释的废气,并且还可以测量颗粒物(PM)排放物。2015 年,加利福尼亚空气资源委员会(CARB)报告称,8%的重型(HD)车辆上的现场柴油颗粒过滤器(DPF)发生故障,并排放了配备 DPF 的车队中总柴油 PM 排放量的约 70%。重型车辆车队中出现了一个新的高排放物问题。路边废气羽流测量反映了实际操作的快照,通常持续几秒钟。为了将路边羽流测量与实验室排放测试相关联,我们分析了在底盘测功机上进行的四个 HD 车辆的几次驾驶循环中收集的二氧化碳(CO),氮氧化物(NO)和 PM 排放。我们检查了与车辆功率有关的可能超过排放标准的燃料基排放因子。我们的分析表明,当燃料基排放因子为 9.3gNO/kg 燃料和 0.11gPM/kg 燃料时,典型的 HD 车辆将超过 2010 年车型年(MY)排放标准(0.2gNO/bhp-hr 和 0.01gPM/bhp-hr)三倍使用路边羽流测量方法。报告的限制对应于 99%的置信水平,这是使用排放分析仪的检测不确定性,车辆功率计算的准确性以及固定操作参数的实际排放变化来计算得出的。PM 阈值仅确定在 0.47 至 1.4mph/sec 之间的加速事件,而 NO 阈值则是根据后处理温度高于 200°C 的测量结果得出的。由于对现实世界驾驶排放的兴趣日益增加,作为在用车辆计划的补充,广泛实施路边废气羽流测量可能会受益于将这种分析扩展到更多的在用重型车辆样本中。
监管机构,民间社会和广大公众对车辆在现实世界中的排放合规性越来越感兴趣。利用路边羽流测量来识别排放控制系统发生故障的车辆,已成为评估实际性能的一种可行的新方法。这项工作通过在实验室中实时分析排放物,提出了 PM 和 NOx 的燃料基排放因子阈值,以表示在特定工作基础上超过排放标准。这些阈值可用于在路边执法检查或其他查询之前对车辆进行预筛选,增强和进一步开发排放清单,并可能为重型车辆检查和维护(I / M)计划开发新的要求,包括但不限于确定进一步测试的车辆。