• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

排干沼泽,让美国再次伟大:特朗普时代的高层不和。

Draining the swamp while making America great again: senior dissonance in the age of Trump.

机构信息

a Boston University School of Social Work , Boston , Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May-Jun;30(3-4):357-371. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1462676.

DOI:10.1080/08959420.2018.1462676
PMID:29652603
Abstract

In his surprise election as president, Donald Trump enjoyed disproportionate electoral support from older voters, many of whom saw in Trump a person who would work to reverse demographic, economic, and cultural forces that had transformed American life as they had long seen it. Yet, Trump's campaign and incumbency has also been very much about gutting the Washington policy establishment of officials, bureaucrats, and lobbyists (aka, "the swamp") which, for more than half a century, has been instrumental in enacting and expanding legislation that has benefitted older Americans far more than any other social policy constituency in the country. This article contrasts the value-oriented electoral support Trump enjoyed from older Americans with their interest concerns centered on policies such as the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid, and a host of smaller grant-in-aid programs. It then reviews the strong institutional base seniors and their advocates have in Washington, posing whether interest-oriented concerns may outweigh ideological ones as policy options emerge from a Republican-controlled government prior to the 2018 elections.

摘要

在唐纳德·特朗普出人意料地当选总统的过程中,老年选民给予了他不成比例的选举支持,其中许多人认为特朗普是一个将努力扭转人口、经济和文化力量的人,这些力量自他们有记忆以来就一直在改变美国人的生活。然而,特朗普的竞选和执政也在很大程度上是为了削弱华盛顿政策制定机构中的官员、官僚和说客(又名“沼泽”),这些人在过去半个多世纪里一直是制定和扩大立法的重要力量,这些立法使美国老年人受益远远超过了该国任何其他社会政策群体。本文对比了特朗普从老年美国人那里获得的以价值观为导向的选举支持,以及他们关注的以《平价医疗法案》、医疗补助和一系列小规模赠款计划为中心的政策利益。然后,本文回顾了老年人及其支持者在华盛顿的强大机构基础,提出了在 2018 年选举之前,共和党控制的政府提出政策选择时,利益导向的问题是否可能超过意识形态问题。

相似文献

1
Draining the swamp while making America great again: senior dissonance in the age of Trump.排干沼泽,让美国再次伟大:特朗普时代的高层不和。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May-Jun;30(3-4):357-371. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1462676.
2
The state of aging policy and politics in the Trump era.特朗普时代的老龄化政策与政治状况。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May-Jun;30(3-4):193-208. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1481314.
3
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
4
Collision course? Donald Trump, Paul Ryan, and the fate of Medicare.《碰撞的轨迹?唐纳德·特朗普、保罗·瑞安和医疗保险的命运》
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May-Jun;30(3-4):244-258. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1462682. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
What Would a Trump Administration 2.0 Mean for Health Care Policy?特朗普政府2.0版对医疗保健政策意味着什么?
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Oct 4;5(10):e244057. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4057.
6
Presidential Elections and HIV-Related National Policies and Programs.总统选举与艾滋病相关的国家政策和项目。
AIDS Behav. 2017 Mar;21(3):611-614. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1703-z.
7
A Seer of Trump's Coming Parses Repeal and Replace.
Manag Care. 2017 Mar;26(3):13-14.
8
President Trump: into the unknown….
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1621. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30582-4. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
9
What's at Stake in U.S. Health Reform: A Guide to the Affordable Care Act and Value-Based Care.美国医疗改革的利害关系:《平价医疗法案》与价值医疗指南
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2017 May;18(2):61-71. doi: 10.1177/1527154417720935. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
10
Shifting threats and rhetoric: how Republican governors framed Medicaid expansion.转变的威胁和言论:共和党州长如何构建医疗补助扩张。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2020 Oct;15(4):496-508. doi: 10.1017/S174413312000002X. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Political and educational dynamics behind the Evangelicals' stance against mask mandates during COVID-19 in the U.S.美国福音派在新冠疫情期间反对强制戴口罩立场背后的政治与教育动态
Soc Sci Res. 2025 Jan;125:103100. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103100. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
2
Political differentiation and consolidation of choice in a U.S. media malaise environment: indirect effects of perceived alikeness on voter participation.美国媒体萎靡环境下的政治分化与选择巩固:感知相似性对选民参与的间接影响
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(7):106. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00394-9. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Cognition and Political Ideology in Aging.
衰老过程中的认知与政治意识形态。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Mar;69(3):762-766. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16935. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
4
The impact of place and legacy framing on climate action: A lifespan approach.地点和遗产框架对气候行动的影响:一种生命周期方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 25;15(2):e0228963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228963. eCollection 2020.