Yan Andrew T, Roe Matthew T, Neely Megan, Cyr Derek D, White Harvey, Fox Keith A A, Prabhakaran Dorairaj, Armstrong Paul W, Ohman Erik M, Goodman Shaun G
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.
Duke Clinical Research Institute.
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Sep;29(6):469-476. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000623.
In the Targeted Platelet Inhibition to Clarify the Optimal Strategy to Medically Manage Acute Coronary Syndromes (TRILOGY ACS) trial of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome managed medically without revascularization, treated with prasugrel versus clopidogrel for less than or equal to 30 months after index acute coronary syndrome, post-hoc analyses showed a divergence of treatment effect in favor of prasugrel after 12 months. Potential influential factors, including a potential late treatment effect after early study drug discontinuation in the intention-to-treat analysis, have not been explored.
We carried out an exploratory, post-hoc analysis of 1436 patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and discontinued the drug 7-365 days after randomization. Kaplan-Meier event rates were evaluated starting at the landmark timepoint of study discontinuation through 2 years of follow-up, and were compared between prasugrel and clopidogrel.
The unadjusted rates of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke were 20.1 versus 24.4% in the prasugrel versus clopidogrel groups (log-rank P=0.069). Similar findings were observed for cardiovascular death (13.3 vs. 18.0%, log-rank P=0.022), and cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (19.3 vs. 23.3%, log-rank P=0.042). In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in the adjusted risk of these outcomes between the prasugrel and clopidogrel groups.
In this hypothesis-generating analysis, high rates of ischemic events were observed after study drug discontinuation, with a lower frequency of events among patients treated with prasugrel versus clopidogrel that did not persist after multivariable adjustment. This analysis highlights the complexities of ascertaining downstream effects of antithrombotic therapies after drug discontinuation.
在“靶向血小板抑制以明确急性冠状动脉综合征药物治疗的最佳策略(TRILOGY ACS)”试验中,对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行药物治疗而非血运重建,在急性冠状动脉综合征发作后使用普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗小于或等于30个月,事后分析显示12个月后治疗效果出现差异,普拉格雷更具优势。尚未探究潜在的影响因素,包括意向性治疗分析中早期停用研究药物后可能存在的晚期治疗效果。
我们对1436例至少接受一剂研究药物且在随机分组后7至365天停药的患者进行了探索性事后分析。通过Kaplan-Meier法评估从研究停药的标志性时间点开始至2年随访期的事件发生率,并比较普拉格雷组和氯吡格雷组。
普拉格雷组与氯吡格雷组心血管死亡、心肌梗死或卒中的主要复合终点未调整发生率分别为20.1%和24.4%(对数秩检验P = 0.069)。心血管死亡(13.3%对18.0%,对数秩检验P = 0.022)以及心血管死亡或心肌梗死(19.3%对23.3%,对数秩检验P = 0.042)也有类似发现。在多变量分析中,普拉格雷组和氯吡格雷组这些结局的调整风险无显著差异。
在这项生成假设的分析中,研究药物停药后观察到缺血事件发生率较高,普拉格雷治疗的患者事件发生率低于氯吡格雷,但多变量调整后这种差异未持续存在。该分析突出了确定停药后抗栓治疗下游效应的复杂性。