You Jai Kyung, Song Mi Kyung, Kim Min Jung, Kim Eun-Kyung, Moon Hee Jung, Youk Ji Hyun, Yoon Jung Hyun, Park Vivian Youngjean, Park Seho, Kim Seung Il, Park Byeong-Woo
Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, NHIS Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Department of Research Affairs, Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Jul;44(7):1355-1363. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
The aim of the work described here was to evaluate whether surveillance with biannual ultrasound (US) plus annual mammography (biannual group) for women with a history of breast cancer surgery results in earlier detection or in the detection of smaller second cancers than annual US plus mammography (annual group). Additionally, we compared the prevalence of distant metastases or palpable second cancers between the biannual and annual groups. The institutional review board of our institution approved this retrospective study, and patient consent was waived. Between January 2011 and December 2012, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical and imaging follow-up of 3023 patients with mammographic and US surveillance after breast cancer surgery to assess second cancers detected by local surveillance (locoregional recurrence, contralateral breast cancer or distant metastasis). The biannual and annual groups were divided with respect to the mean surveillance interval and compared with respect to clinicopathologic findings. Multivariable logistic regression with propensity score methods was used to examine the effect of the type of surveillance on outcomes. As for the size of the second cancer, no difference was seen between the biannual and annual groups (12.8 ± 6.6 mm vs. 14.1 ± 7.1 mm, p = 0.461); neither was there a significant difference between the groups in the presence of symptoms at the time of diagnosis of the second cancer (17.0% [8/47] vs. 10% [2/20], p = 0.711). Regardless of detection by local surveillance, the prevalence of distant metastases did not differ between the two groups (1.1% [27/2370] vs. 1.0% [7/653], p = 0.88) on univariate or multivariate analysis. The results of our retrospective study indicate that second cancers detected by biannual US surveillance in patients with a history of breast cancer surgery are not smaller and do not occur earlier than those detected by annual US surveillance. However, a randomized controlled study is required to verify these results before they can be generalized to clinical practice.
本文所述工作的目的是评估,对于有乳腺癌手术史的女性,每半年进行一次超声(US)检查加每年进行一次乳房X线摄影检查(半年组),与每年进行一次US检查加乳房X线摄影检查(每年组)相比,是否能更早发现或检测到更小的第二原发癌。此外,我们比较了半年组和每年组远处转移或可触及的第二原发癌的发生率。我们机构的机构审查委员会批准了这项回顾性研究,并免除了患者的知情同意。2011年1月至2012年12月期间,我们回顾性分析了3023例乳腺癌手术后接受乳房X线摄影和US监测的患者的临床和影像随访情况,以评估通过局部监测(局部区域复发、对侧乳腺癌或远处转移)检测到的第二原发癌。根据平均监测间隔对半年组和每年组进行划分,并比较其临床病理结果。采用倾向评分法进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以检验监测类型对结果的影响。至于第二原发癌的大小,半年组和每年组之间未见差异(12.8±6.6mm对14.1±7.1mm,p = 0.461);在第二原发癌诊断时两组出现症状的情况也无显著差异(17.0%[8/47]对10%[2/20],p = 0.711)。无论是否通过局部监测发现,单因素或多因素分析显示两组远处转移的发生率无差异(1.1%[27/2370]对1.0%[7/653],p = 0.88)。我们的回顾性研究结果表明,有乳腺癌手术史的患者通过每半年一次US监测检测到的第二原发癌,并不比每年一次US监测检测到的更小,也不会更早出现。然而,在这些结果能够推广到临床实践之前,需要进行一项随机对照研究来验证。