Pedemonte Trewhela Christian, Díaz Reiher Marlene, Muñoz Zavala Tamara, González Mora L Edgardo, Vargas Farren Ilich
Staff Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Clínico Mutual de Seguridad CChC, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Resident, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Clínico Mutual de Seguridad CChC, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;76(9):1937-1945. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
To determine the relation between overcorrection of orbital volume and ocular projection in patients with orbital trauma.
A prospective cohort study was performed of patients with enophthalmos as a side effect of orbital trauma. The sample included patients older than 18 years who required reconstruction using customized implants to treat enophthalmos with or without diplopia. The exclusion criteria were patients who had multiple or extended fractures and patients with amaurosis or a prosthetic eye. Orbital volumes were calculated and the position of the eyeball in the healthy and traumatized sockets was determined before and after installing the implant and the ratio between these variables was calculated. Two variables were identified: 1) orbital volume and 2) enophthalmos. Analysis of the estimator variables was performed, defining 3 groups: 1) healthy eye socket, 2) traumatized eye socket without implant, and 3) traumatized eye socket with implant. The Shapiro-Wilk test, paired t test, and linear regression analysis were performed. A P value less than .05 (95% confidence interval) indicated significant differences.
Of 294 patients who underwent orbital zygomatic complex reconstruction surgery, 13 required customized implants and only 5 met the inclusion criteria. The average volumetric variation in the groups of traumatized eye sockets with and without implants was statistically significant (P < .05), overcorrecting by an average of 4.2 cm. The average enophthalmos variation in the groups of traumatized eye sockets with and without implants was statistically significant (P < .05), projecting the eyeball by an average 1.80 mm. The ratio between the average orbital volume and projection of the eyeball was determined to be 1:0.721 (correlation, 45.6%).
This study concluded that the eyeball is projected 0.7 mm for every 1 cm of volume added in customized orbital implants. However, additional clinical studies with larger samples should be conducted.
确定眼眶创伤患者眼眶容积过度矫正与眼球突出之间的关系。
对因眼眶创伤导致眼球内陷的患者进行前瞻性队列研究。样本包括年龄超过18岁、需要使用定制植入物进行重建以治疗眼球内陷(伴或不伴有复视)的患者。排除标准为有多处或广泛性骨折的患者以及患有黑矇或假眼的患者。计算眼眶容积,并在植入植入物前后确定健康眼窝和受伤眼窝中眼球的位置,并计算这些变量之间的比率。确定了两个变量:1)眼眶容积和2)眼球内陷。对估计变量进行分析,定义3组:1)健康眼窝,2)未植入植入物的受伤眼窝,3)植入植入物的受伤眼窝。进行了Shapiro-Wilk检验、配对t检验和线性回归分析。P值小于0.05(95%置信区间)表示有显著差异。
在294例行眼眶颧复合体重建手术的患者中,13例需要定制植入物,只有5例符合纳入标准。植入和未植入植入物的受伤眼窝组的平均容积变化具有统计学意义(P < 0.05),平均过度矫正4.2 cm。植入和未植入植入物的受伤眼窝组的平均眼球内陷变化具有统计学意义(P < 0.05),眼球平均突出1.80 mm。确定平均眼眶容积与眼球突出之间的比率为1:0.721(相关性为45.6%)。
本研究得出结论,定制眼眶植入物每增加1 cm的容积,眼球突出0.7 mm。然而,应进行更大样本量的额外临床研究。