• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于摩擦嵴皮肤印痕证据的统计解释方法:方法开发与验证

A method for the statistical interpretation of friction ridge skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.

作者信息

Swofford H J, Koertner A J, Zemp F, Ausdemore M, Liu A, Salyards M J

机构信息

U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory, Defense Forensic Science Center, USA.

U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory, Defense Forensic Science Center, USA.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jun;287:113-126. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.043. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.043
PMID:29655097
Abstract

The forensic fingerprint community has faced increasing amounts of criticism by scientific and legal commentators, challenging the validity and reliability of fingerprint evidence due to the lack of an empirically demonstrable basis to evaluate and report the strength of the evidence in a given case. This paper presents a method, developed as a stand-alone software application, FRStat, which provides a statistical assessment of the strength of fingerprint evidence. The performance was evaluated using a variety of mated and non-mated datasets. The results show strong performance characteristics, often with values supporting specificity rates greater than 99%. This method provides fingerprint experts the capability to demonstrate the validity and reliability of fingerprint evidence in a given case and report the findings in a more transparent and standardized fashion with clearly defined criteria for conclusions and known error rate information thereby responding to concerns raised by the scientific and legal communities.

摘要

法医指纹学界受到了科学和法律评论家越来越多的批评,他们质疑指纹证据的有效性和可靠性,因为缺乏一个基于实证的可证明基础来评估和报告特定案件中证据的强度。本文介绍了一种作为独立软件应用程序开发的方法,即FRStat,它提供了对指纹证据强度的统计评估。使用各种匹配和不匹配的数据集对其性能进行了评估。结果显示出强大的性能特征,其值通常支持特异性率大于99%。这种方法使指纹专家能够在特定案件中证明指纹证据的有效性和可靠性,并以更透明和标准化的方式报告结果,为结论制定明确的标准并提供已知的错误率信息,从而回应科学和法律界提出的担忧。

相似文献

1
A method for the statistical interpretation of friction ridge skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.一种用于摩擦嵴皮肤印痕证据的统计解释方法:方法开发与验证
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jun;287:113-126. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.043. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
2
A method for measuring the quality of friction skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.一种测量摩擦性皮肤印痕证据质量的方法:方法开发与验证。
Forensic Sci Int. 2021 Mar;320:110703. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110703. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
3
Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review.现代法医指纹鉴定统计模型:批判性回顾。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Oct 10;232(1-3):131-50. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
4
Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.利用质量度量和统计评估工具为指纹分析师提供决策信息。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Jun 10;219(1-3):183-98. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.017. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
5
Integration of pore features into the evaluation of fingerprint evidence.将毛孔特征纳入指纹证据评估中。
J Forensic Sci. 2014 Jan;59(1):82-93. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12302. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
6
Sex differences in fingerprint ridge density in a Turkish young adult population: a sample of Baskent University.土耳其年轻成年人群指纹嵴密度的性别差异:以巴斯肯大学的样本为例
J Forensic Leg Med. 2015 May;32:34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
7
A study of sex differences in fingerprint ridge density in a North Indian young adult population.一项关于北印度年轻成年人指纹嵴密度性别差异的研究。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 May;20(4):217-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
8
Fingerprint pattern restoration by digital image processing techniques.通过数字图像处理技术恢复指纹图案。
J Forensic Sci. 2003 Sep;48(5):973-84.
9
Testing the accuracy and reliability of palmar friction ridge comparisons - A black box study.测试掌纹比对的准确性和可靠性 - 黑盒研究。
Forensic Sci Int. 2021 Jan;318:110457. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110457. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
10
Not all identification conclusions are equal: Quantifying the strength of fingerprint decisions.并非所有的识别结论都具有同等效力:量化指纹决策的力度。
Forensic Sci Int. 2023 Feb;343:111543. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111543. Epub 2023 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the strength of palmprint comparisons: Majority identifications with surprisingly low value.量化掌纹比对的强度:多数认定的价值低得出奇。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2025 Jul 23;11:100628. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100628. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Subtleties in Bayesian decision-theoretic analysis for forensic findings: Notes on recent discussion of the role of validation study data in rational decision making.法医鉴定结果的贝叶斯决策理论分析中的微妙之处:关于验证研究数据在理性决策中作用的近期讨论笔记
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Aug 31;9:100548. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100548. eCollection 2024.
3
Research on likelihood ratio evaluation method of fingerprint evidence based on parameter estimation method.
基于参数估计方法的指纹证据似然比评估方法研究
Forensic Sci Res. 2024 Jan 11;9(1):owae002. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owae002. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives within the American criminal justice system.法医学中的概率报告与算法:美国刑事司法系统内利益相关者的观点
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Feb 12;4:100220. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100220. eCollection 2022.
5
Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: "Inconclusive" decisions and the structure of error rate studies.法医学与排中律:“不确定”的决策以及错误率研究的结构
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Apr 17;3:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100147. eCollection 2021.
6
Implementation of algorithms in pattern & impression evidence: A responsible and practical roadmap.模式与痕迹证据中算法的应用:一份负责任且实用的路线图。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Feb 18;3:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100142. eCollection 2021.
7
Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016-2019.国际刑警组织2016 - 2019年指纹及其他身体印记审查
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Mar 17;2:442-480. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.013. eCollection 2020.