Lara-Ortega Felipe J, Robles-Molina José, Brandt Sebastian, Schütz Alexander, Gilbert-López Bienvenida, Molina-Díaz Antonio, García-Reyes Juan F, Franzke Joachim
Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften -ISAS e.V., Dortmund, Germany; Analytical Chemistry Research Group, Department of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén Spain.
Analytical Chemistry Research Group, Department of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén Spain.
Anal Chim Acta. 2018 Aug 22;1020:76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.077. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
Although electrospray ionization (ESI) remains the gold standard ionization source for LC-MS, it exhibits two main limitations: the occurrence of matrix effects and the limited ionization coverage towards nonpolar compounds. Dielectric barrier discharge ionization (DBDI) has gained attraction in recent years as a versatile ionization method in different applications and formats. Here, we report a thorough evaluation of DBDI as ionization interface for LC-MS, which reveals attractive advantages over ESI and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) provided its singular ionization mechanism versatility. A suite of 80 pesticides across a wide range of physicochemical properties were selected and the results were compared with both ESI and APCI sources. Using a helium plasma operated in homogeneous regime with square-wave AC waveform and relatively low voltages (2.5 kV), not only DBDI was able to ionize compounds only amenable so far by GC-MS (eg. organochlorine species), but also offered a competitive performance in terms of sensitivity when contrasted with the commercial electrospray ionization source under equivalent conditions. Unlike ESI, DBDI mechanism occurs in the gas-phase, so the method is less affected by liquid-phase surface phenomena that yield ion suppression in ESI. Data collected in the positive ion mode revealed negligible matrix effect values (<10% suppression) for most of the studied compounds in different complex matrix extracts such as wastewater, orange or olive oil. This is also consistent with the absence of adduct formation whereas with ESI source, Na adduct formation is quite common with these species. In general, both sensitivity and average limits of quantitation for DBDI were similar to those obtained by ESI and better than APCI. Results showed that analyte coverage with DBDI is enhanced with respect to ESI and APCI sources being able to effectively analyze organochlorine compounds.
尽管电喷雾电离(ESI)仍是液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS)的金标准电离源,但它存在两个主要局限性:存在基质效应以及对非极性化合物的电离覆盖范围有限。近年来,介质阻挡放电电离(DBDI)作为一种在不同应用和形式中通用的电离方法受到了关注。在此,我们报告了对DBDI作为LC-MS电离接口的全面评估,结果表明,鉴于其独特的电离机制通用性,DBDI相对于ESI和大气压化学电离(APCI)具有吸引人的优势。我们选择了一组涵盖广泛物理化学性质的80种农药,并将结果与ESI和APCI源进行了比较。使用以方波交流波形和相对低电压(2.5 kV)在均匀模式下运行的氦等离子体,DBDI不仅能够电离迄今为止仅能用气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS)分析的化合物(如有机氯类),而且在等效条件下与商业电喷雾电离源相比,在灵敏度方面也具有竞争力。与ESI不同,DBDI机制发生在气相中,因此该方法受液相表面现象的影响较小,而液相表面现象会导致ESI中的离子抑制。在正离子模式下收集的数据显示,在不同复杂基质提取物(如废水、橙汁或橄榄油)中,大多数研究化合物的基质效应值可忽略不计(抑制率<10%)。这也与未形成加合物一致,而使用ESI源时,这些物质很常见形成钠加合物。总体而言,DBDI的灵敏度和平均定量限与ESI获得的结果相似,且优于APCI。结果表明,相对于ESI和APCI源,DBDI对分析物的覆盖范围有所增强,能够有效分析有机氯化合物。