Department of Epidemiology of Health Products, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis; UMR-S 1136, INSERM & UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris; Department of Gastroenterology, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris.
Department of Epidemiology of Health Products, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis.
Gastroenterology. 2018 Aug;155(2):337-346.e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The risk of infection associated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF) and thiopurines (combination therapy) is uncertain. We assessed the risk of serious and opportunistic infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with thiopurine monotherapy, anti-TNF monotherapy, or combination therapy in a large cohort of patients in France.
We performed a nationwide population-based study of patients (18 years or older) with a diagnosis of IBD in the French national health insurance database; we collected data from January 1, 2009 until December 31, 2014. The risks of serious and opportunistic infections associated with exposure to combination therapy, anti-TNF, and thiopurine monotherapies were compared using marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for baseline and time-varying sociodemographic characteristics, medications, and comorbidities.
Among the 190,694 patients with IBD included in our analysis, 8561 serious infections and 674 opportunistic infections occurred. Compared with anti-TNF monotherapy, combination therapy was associated with increased risks of serious infection (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.45) and opportunistic infection (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.32-2.91). Compared with thiopurine monotherapy, anti-TNF monotherapy was associated with increased risks of serious infection (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.56-1.88), mycobacterial infection (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.15-3.40), and bacterial infection (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.23-4.58, respectively). Conversely, anti-TNF monotherapy was associated with decreased risk of opportunistic viral infection compared with thiopurine monotherapy (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.87).
In a nationwide cohort study of patients with IBD in France, we found heterogeneity in risks of serious and opportunistic infections in patients treated with immune-suppressive regimens. These should be carefully considered and weighed against potential benefits for IBD treatment in patient management.
肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂(抗 TNF)和硫嘌呤(联合治疗)相关感染的风险尚不确定。我们评估了在法国的一个大型患者队列中,接受硫嘌呤单药治疗、抗 TNF 单药治疗或联合治疗的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者发生严重和机会性感染的风险。
我们对法国国家健康保险数据库中诊断为 IBD 的患者(18 岁或以上)进行了一项全国范围内的基于人群的研究;我们从 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日收集数据。使用调整基线和时变社会人口统计学特征、药物和合并症的边缘结构 Cox 比例风险模型比较了联合治疗、抗 TNF 和硫嘌呤单药治疗与严重和机会性感染相关的风险。
在我们的分析中,190694 例 IBD 患者中有 8561 例发生严重感染,674 例发生机会性感染。与抗 TNF 单药治疗相比,联合治疗与严重感染(风险比[HR],1.23;95%置信区间[CI],1.05-1.45)和机会性感染(HR,1.96;95% CI,1.32-2.91)的风险增加相关。与硫嘌呤单药治疗相比,抗 TNF 单药治疗与严重感染(HR,1.71;95% CI,1.56-1.88)、分枝杆菌感染(HR,1.98;95% CI,1.15-3.40)和细菌感染(HR,2.38;95% CI,1.23-4.58)的风险增加相关。相反,与硫嘌呤单药治疗相比,抗 TNF 单药治疗与机会性病毒感染的风险降低相关(HR,0.57;95% CI,0.38-0.87)。
在法国的一项全国性 IBD 患者队列研究中,我们发现接受免疫抑制治疗方案的患者发生严重和机会性感染的风险存在异质性。在患者管理中,应仔细考虑并权衡这些风险与潜在的 IBD 治疗益处。