• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二乙酰吗啡和氢吗啡酮随机对照试验参与者的就业和有偿工作比较。

Employment and paid work among participants in a randomized controlled trial comparing diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone.

机构信息

Institute of Mental Health, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences (CHEOS), Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.

University of Basel, Department of Psychiatry (UPK), Division of Addictive Disorders, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jul;57:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.021
PMID:29655955
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Employment is one of the less studied but a significant outcome of medication-assisted treatment. Thus, we aimed to explore employment outcomes of medication-assisted treatment with hydromorphone (HDM) or diacetylmorphine (DAM). The secondary aim was to estimate characteristics of this population as well as treatment-related factors associated with these outcomes.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a randomized, double blind controlled trial. A total of 102 and 100 participants were randomized to receive injectable DAM or HDM for 6 months respectively. In stage 2, 144 participants were randomized again to receive either oral or injectable forms of the medication they received for another 6 months. Participants were interviewed at 5 timepoints: before and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment assignment. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) with a logit link was fitted to determine factors related to paid work in the past 30 days.

RESULTS

Mean age of participants was 44.3 (SD = 9.6) and 59 (29.2%) participants were men. At each timepoint, 6-8 (3.6%-4.1%) participants reported employment in the past 30 days and 40 to 52 (19.7%-26.7%) reported minimum 1 day of paid work. University or college education [OR = 2.12: 95% CI = (1.25, 3.62), P = 0.01] was significantly associated with paid work after adjustment for age, gender, treatment arms, timepoints, days receiving study treatment, physical health, psychological health and crack cocaine use in the past 30 days.

CONCLUSION

The rate of employment was lower among participants of this study compared to similar studies on heroin-assisted treatment. Higher education was associated with increased odds of paid work. A large gap exists between employment rate and the proportion of participants who reported paid work. Supported employment and occupational therapy could optimize the employment outcomes of this population.

摘要

背景

就业是药物辅助治疗中研究较少但意义重大的结果之一。因此,我们旨在探讨氢可酮(HDM)或二乙酰吗啡(DAM)药物辅助治疗的就业结果。次要目的是评估该人群的特征以及与这些结果相关的治疗相关因素。

方法

这是一项随机、双盲对照试验的二次分析。共有 102 名和 100 名参与者分别被随机分配接受 6 个月的注射用 DAM 或 HDM 治疗。在第 2 阶段,又有 144 名参与者被随机再次接受他们接受的药物的口服或注射形式治疗 6 个月。参与者在治疗分配前和治疗后 3、6、9 和 12 个月接受了 5 次访谈。使用对数链接的广义估计方程(GEE)拟合确定与过去 30 天内有薪工作相关的因素。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为 44.3(SD=9.6),59 名(29.2%)参与者为男性。在每个时间点,有 6-8 名(3.6%-4.1%)参与者报告过去 30 天内有薪工作,有 40-52 名(19.7%-26.7%)参与者报告至少有 1 天有薪工作。在调整年龄、性别、治疗手臂、时间点、接受研究治疗的天数、身体健康、心理健康和过去 30 天内使用快克可卡因后,大学或学院教育[OR=2.12:95%CI=(1.25,3.62),P=0.01]与有薪工作显著相关。

结论

与类似的海洛因辅助治疗研究相比,这项研究的参与者的就业率较低。高等教育与有偿工作的几率增加相关。就业比率和报告有薪工作的参与者比例之间存在很大差距。支持性就业和职业治疗可以优化该人群的就业结果。

相似文献

1
Employment and paid work among participants in a randomized controlled trial comparing diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone.二乙酰吗啡和氢吗啡酮随机对照试验参与者的就业和有偿工作比较。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jul;57:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Characteristics and response to treatment among Indigenous people receiving injectable diacetylmorphine or hydromorphone in a randomised controlled trial for the treatment of long-term opioid dependence.在一项治疗长期阿片类药物依赖的随机对照试验中,接受注射二乙酰吗啡或氢吗啡酮的原住民人群的特征和治疗反应。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jan;37(1):137-146. doi: 10.1111/dar.12573. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
3
Hydromorphone Compared With Diacetylmorphine for Long-term Opioid Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.氢吗啡酮与二乙酰吗啡治疗长期阿片类药物依赖的随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 May 1;73(5):447-55. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0109.
4
Men's and women's response to treatment and perceptions of outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of injectable opioid assisted treatment for severe opioid use disorder.在一项针对严重阿片类药物使用障碍的注射用阿片类药物辅助治疗随机对照试验中,男性和女性对治疗的反应及对结果的认知。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017 May 19;12(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13011-017-0110-9.
5
Cost-effectiveness of hydromorphone for severe opioid use disorder: findings from the SALOME randomized clinical trial.氢吗啡酮治疗严重阿片类药物使用障碍的成本效益:来自 SALOME 随机临床试验的结果。
Addiction. 2018 Jul;113(7):1264-1273. doi: 10.1111/add.14171. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
Double-blind injectable hydromorphone versus diacetylmorphine for the treatment of opioid dependence: a pilot study.双盲注射氢可酮与二乙酰吗啡治疗阿片类药物依赖:一项初步研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jun;38(4):408-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
7
Safety profile of injectable hydromorphone and diacetylmorphine for long-term severe opioid use disorder.注射用氢吗啡酮和二乙酰吗啡用于长期重度阿片类药物使用障碍的安全性概况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Jul 1;176:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 May 10.
8
Client satisfaction among participants in a randomized trial comparing oral methadone and injectable diacetylmorphine for long-term opioid-dependency.口服美沙酮与注射二乙酰吗啡治疗长期阿片类药物依赖的随机试验中参与者的满意度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jul 26;11:174. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-174.
9
Treatment with injectable hydromorphone: Comparing retention in double blind and open label treatment periods.注射用氢吗啡酮治疗:双盲和开放标签治疗期的保留率比较。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Jun;101:50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
Adverse Events During Treatment Induction With Injectable Diacetylmorphine and Hydromorphone for Opioid Use Disorder.在使用注射用二乙酰吗啡和氢吗啡酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍时的治疗诱导期的不良反应。
J Addict Med. 2019 Sep/Oct;13(5):354-361. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000505.