Suppr超能文献

在 52 周后,MYL-1501D 对比甘精胰岛素在 1 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性:INSTRIDE 1 期 III 期研究结果。

Efficacy and safety of MYL-1501D vs insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes after 52 weeks: Results of the INSTRIDE 1 phase III study.

机构信息

Texas Diabetes and Endocrinology, Austin, Texas.

Mylan Inc., Canonsburg, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Aug;20(8):1944-1950. doi: 10.1111/dom.13322. Epub 2018 May 7.

Abstract

AIM

To test the safety and efficacy of MYL-1501D, a proposed insulin glargine biosimilar, in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

The safety and efficacy of MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine were evaluated in INSTRIDE 1, a 52-week, open-label, randomized, phase III study in patients with T1DM. The primary objective was to determine whether once-daily MYL-1501D was non-inferior to once-daily insulin glargine when administered in combination with mealtime insulin lispro based on change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints were changes in fasting plasma glucose, insulin dose, self-monitored blood glucose and immunogenicity from baseline, and occurrences of hypoglycaemic, nocturnal hypoglycaemic and adverse events up to week 52.

RESULTS

Overall, 558 patients were randomized 1:1 to MYL-1501D or reference insulin glargine in combination with thrice-daily mealtime insulin lispro for 52 weeks. The mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was 0.14% (standard error [SE] 0.054; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.033, 0.244) for MYL-1501D and 0.11% (SE 0.054; 95% CI 0.007, 0.220) for reference insulin glargine. MYL-1501D had a safety profile similar to that of reference insulin glargine and was well tolerated in patients with T1DM up to week 52.

CONCLUSIONS

The upper 95% CI limit for mean change in HbA1c at week 24 indicated that MYL-1501D was non-inferior to reference insulin glargine. There were no clinically meaningful differences between groups in incidence of overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, local or systemic reactions, safety or immunogenicity.

摘要

目的

评估 MYL-1501D(一种拟胰岛素甘精类似物)在 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)患者中的安全性和疗效。

方法

在一项 52 周、开放性、随机、III 期 INSTRIDE 1 研究中评估了 MYL-1501D 和参考胰岛素甘精的安全性和疗效,该研究纳入了 T1DM 患者。主要目的是确定每日一次 MYL-1501D 联合餐时赖脯胰岛素与每日一次参考胰岛素甘精相比,在 24 周时基于糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)从基线的变化是否具有非劣效性。次要终点是从基线开始的空腹血糖、胰岛素剂量、自我监测血糖的变化以及免疫原性,以及直至 52 周时的低血糖、夜间低血糖和不良事件的发生情况。

结果

总体而言,558 例患者按 1:1 随机分为 MYL-1501D 或参考胰岛素甘精组,联合三餐时赖脯胰岛素治疗 52 周。从基线到 24 周时,HbA1c 的平均变化率为 MYL-1501D 组为 0.14%(标准误差[SE]0.054;95%置信区间[CI]0.033,0.244),参考胰岛素甘精组为 0.11%(SE0.054;95%CI0.007,0.220)。MYL-1501D 的安全性特征与参考胰岛素甘精相似,在 T1DM 患者中耐受良好,直至 52 周。

结论

24 周时 HbA1c 平均变化的上限 95%CI 表明,MYL-1501D 与参考胰岛素甘精具有非劣效性。两组在总体和夜间低血糖、局部或全身反应、安全性或免疫原性方面无临床意义的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验