• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在子宫内膜样腺癌中进行错配修复蛋白缺陷的免疫组织化学检测,无论是在子宫内膜活检/刮宫标本还是在子宫切除标本上进行,结果都是等效的。

Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair protein deficiency in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma yields equivalent results when performed on endometrial biopsy/curettage or hysterectomy specimens.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jun;149(3):570-574. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.005
PMID:29656794
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Universal screening of endometrial cancer (EC) for Lynch syndrome (LS) has been increasingly implemented in the past five to ten years. Most pathologists initiate screening with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair proteins (MMRPs), using either pre-surgical samplings (endometrial biopsy or curettage, EMB/C) or hysterectomy specimens. We report a systematic assessment of the equivalence of IHC for LS screening on EMB/C versus hysterectomy specimens.

METHODS

We identified 99 patients diagnosed with endometrioid EC and performed IHC for MMRPs MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 on their diagnostic EMB/C and paired hysterectomy specimen. Each specimen was scored as MMRP-retained or MMRP-deficient.

RESULTS

Ninety-one EMB/Cs had carcinoma, while 8 EMB/Cs showed only complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH). Carcinoma was identified in all 99 hysterectomy specimens. Considering all 99 patients tested, concordance of MMRP expression pattern between EMB/C and paired hysterectomy specimen was 100%. Sixty-nine cases retained all four MMRPs, while 30 were MMRP deficient (26 MLH1- and PMS2-deficient, 3 MSH2- and MSH6-deficient, 1 PMS2-deficient).

CONCLUSIONS

In screening for LS in EC, IHC for MMRPs can be performed with identical accuracy on either EMB/C or hysterectomy specimens. Routine testing of diagnostic EMB/Cs may lead to earlier detection of MMRP deficiency, with improved patient uptake of genetic counseling and potential for earlier identification of immunotherapy candidates. Furthermore, reliable IHC-based LS screening performed on EMB/C can guide patient management and genetic counseling in patients unable to undergo hysterectomy.

摘要

目的

在过去的五到十年中,林奇综合征(LS)的子宫内膜癌(EC)普遍筛查已逐渐得到实施。大多数病理学家开始使用免疫组织化学(IHC)对错配修复蛋白(MMRPs)进行筛查,使用的标本包括术前采样(子宫内膜活检或刮宫术,EMB/C)或子宫切除术标本。我们报告了对 EMB/C 与子宫切除术标本用于 LS 筛查的 IHC 等效性的系统评估。

方法

我们鉴定了 99 例诊断为子宫内膜样 EC 的患者,并对其诊断性 EMB/C 和配对的子宫切除术标本进行了 MMRPs MLH1、MSH2、MSH6 和 PMS2 的 IHC。每个标本的评分均为 MMRP 保留或 MMRP 缺失。

结果

91 例 EMB/C 中有癌,而 8 例 EMB/C 仅显示复杂不典型增生(CAH)。所有 99 例子宫切除术标本均鉴定出癌。考虑到所有 99 例测试患者,EMB/C 和配对子宫切除术标本之间的 MMRP 表达模式的一致性为 100%。69 例保留了所有 4 种 MMRP,而 30 例为 MMRP 缺失(26 例 MLH1 和 PMS2 缺失,3 例 MSH2 和 MSH6 缺失,1 例 PMS2 缺失)。

结论

在 EC 中进行 LS 筛查时,MMRP 的 IHC 可在 EMB/C 或子宫切除术标本上以相同的准确性进行。常规检测诊断性 EMB/C 可能会更早地发现 MMRP 缺陷,提高患者对遗传咨询的接受度,并有可能更早地确定免疫治疗候选者。此外,在无法进行子宫切除术的患者中,基于可靠的 IHC 的 LS 筛查可以指导患者管理和遗传咨询。

相似文献

1
Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair protein deficiency in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma yields equivalent results when performed on endometrial biopsy/curettage or hysterectomy specimens.在子宫内膜样腺癌中进行错配修复蛋白缺陷的免疫组织化学检测,无论是在子宫内膜活检/刮宫标本还是在子宫切除标本上进行,结果都是等效的。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jun;149(3):570-574. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
2
Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers: frequency of germline mutations and identification of patients with Lynch-like syndrome.林奇综合征在子宫内膜癌中的普遍筛查:种系突变的频率及林奇样综合征患者的鉴定。
Hum Pathol. 2017 Dec;70:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
3
Universal endometrial cancer tumor typing: How much has immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, and MLH1 methylation improved the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome across the population?通用子宫内膜癌肿瘤分型:免疫组织化学、微卫星不稳定性和 MLH1 甲基化在多大程度上改善了人群中林奇综合征的诊断?
Cancer. 2019 Sep 15;125(18):3172-3183. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32203. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Lessons learnt from implementation of a Lynch syndrome screening program for patients with gynaecological malignancy.从为妇科恶性肿瘤患者实施林奇综合征筛查计划中吸取的经验教训。
Pathology. 2017 Aug;49(5):457-464. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
5
Mismatch Repair Protein Expression in Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia/Atypical Hyperplasia: Should We Screen for Lynch Syndrome in Precancerous Lesions?错配修复蛋白在子宫内膜样上皮内肿瘤/不典型增生中的表达:我们是否应该在癌前病变中筛查林奇综合征?
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019 Nov;38(6):533-542. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000557.
6
Endometrial carcinomas in women aged 40 years and younger: tumors associated with loss of DNA mismatch repair proteins comprise a distinct clinicopathologic subset.40岁及以下女性的子宫内膜癌:与DNA错配修复蛋白缺失相关的肿瘤构成一个独特的临床病理亚组。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Dec;33(12):1869-77. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181bc9866.
7
[Expression and clinical significance of MMR protein and MLH1 promoter methylation testing in endometrial cancer].[错配修复蛋白及MLH1启动子甲基化检测在子宫内膜癌中的表达及临床意义]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 25;53(12):823-830. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.12.005.
8
Frequent Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency in Mixed Endometrioid and Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Endometrium.子宫内膜混合性子宫内膜样癌和透明细胞癌中频繁的错配修复蛋白缺陷
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2017 Nov;36(6):555-561. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000369.
9
Comparison of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome in patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer: a prospective cohort study in China.中国一项新诊断子宫内膜癌患者林奇综合征筛查策略的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 Jul 15;39(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0388-2.
10
Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.对于年龄小于 60 岁的子宫内膜癌患者,进行肿瘤错配修复免疫组化和 MLH1 甲基化 DNA 检测,可以优化人群级别的种系错配修复基因突变检测的分诊。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 10;32(2):90-100. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.2129. Epub 2013 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Colombian consensus for the molecular diagnosis of endometrial cancer.哥伦比亚子宫内膜癌分子诊断共识。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2024 Jun 17;75(1):4060. doi: 10.18597/rcog.4060.
2
Epigenetic MMR defect identifies a risk group not accounted for through traditional risk stratification algorithms in endometrial cancer.表观遗传错配修复缺陷识别出子宫内膜癌中传统风险分层算法未涵盖的一个风险组。
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 6;13:1147657. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1147657. eCollection 2023.
3
The Role of Immunohistochemistry Markers in Endometrial Cancer with Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Systematic Review.
免疫组化标志物在错配修复缺陷型子宫内膜癌中的作用:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 3;14(15):3783. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153783.
4
Endometrial Cancer Following Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Insertion in Young Women with Atypical Hyperplasia: Two Case Reports and Literature Review.左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统放置后致年轻女性子宫内膜不典型增生恶变:两例报告及文献复习
Reprod Sci. 2022 Nov;29(11):3278-3284. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-00982-3. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Identifying patients with Lynch syndrome using a universal tumor screening program in an integrated healthcare system.在综合医疗保健系统中,通过通用肿瘤筛查计划识别林奇综合征患者。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Apr 18;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00217-1.
6
Evaluating Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability Status Using Cytology Effusion Specimens to Determine Eligibility for Immunotherapy.使用细胞学胸腔积液标本评估错配修复/微卫星不稳定状态,以确定免疫治疗的资格。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Jan 1;145(1):46-54. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0398-OA.
7
Aurora-A Induces Chemoresistance Through Activation of the AKT/mTOR Pathway in Endometrial Cancer.极光激酶A通过激活子宫内膜癌中的AKT/mTOR信号通路诱导化疗耐药。
Front Oncol. 2019 May 22;9:422. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00422. eCollection 2019.
8
Current Systemic Treatment Landscape of Advanced Gynecologic Malignancies.晚期妇科恶性肿瘤的当前全身治疗现状。
Target Oncol. 2019 Jun;14(3):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s11523-019-00641-9.