Frank Arthur W
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2018;8(1):35-40. doi: 10.1353/nib.2018.0020.
This commentary discusses twelve stories in which physicians tell what happened when they were involved in the care of a family member. The stories display considerable differences in attitude toward the ethics and usefulness of physicians treating members of their own families. But the more significant tension is between the analytical or objective attitude that all the writers presuppose as necessary for doing good medical work, opposed to the emotions aroused by seeing a loved one suffer. The commentary explores the implications of assuming this binary opposition, whether it is correct, and how far it is actually necessary. Concluding comments discuss what kind of ethics is involved in stories that are all about dilemmas and decisions, but rarely invoke concepts from bioethics.
这篇评论探讨了十二个故事，在这些故事中，医生们讲述了他们在照顾家庭成员时所发生的事情。这些故事在对待医生治疗自己家庭成员的伦理和实用性的态度上表现出相当大的差异。但更显著的矛盾存在于所有作者都认为做好医疗工作所必需的分析性或客观性态度，与看到亲人受苦所引发的情感之间。该评论探讨了假设这种二元对立的含义、它是否正确以及实际需要到何种程度。结语讨论了在这些全是关于困境和决策但很少援引生物伦理概念的故事中涉及何种伦理。
