Miller Andrew J, Livesey Michael, Martin Dennis P, Abboudi Jack, Kirkpatrick William H, Liss Frederic E, Jones Christopher M, Wang Mark L, Matzon Jonas L, Ilyas Asif M
Orthopedics. 2018 May 1;41(3):e410-e415. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180409-04. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
Trapeziectomy alone or in combination with a suspensionplasty technique is a common surgical treatment for symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. The authors undertook a prospective comparative study to test the hypothesis that peripheral nerve blocks would provide better pain control than local anesthesia with bupivacaine or liposomal bupivacaine regarding pain scores and opioid pill consumption. Patients who elected to undergo basal joint arthroplasty were allocated to 1 of 3 postoperative pain management groups: (1) peripheral nerve block, (2) local anesthesia with bupivacaine, or (3) local anesthesia with liposomal bupivacaine. Total opioid pill consumption and visual analog scale pain scores were reported for the first 5 postoperative days (PODs). Seventy-eight patients were enrolled, with 27, 23, and 28 patients in the peripheral nerve block, bupivacaine, and liposomal bupivacaine groups, respectively. All groups experienced an increase in opioid pill consumption and visual analog scale pain scores from POD 0 to POD 1. Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores were lowest in group 3 from POD 0 to POD 2. Average visual analog scale pain scores were highest in group 1, except for on POD 0. After POD 2, visual analog scale pain scores normalized between all groups and decreased uniformly thereafter. Total opioid consumption was lowest in group 3 (average, 11 pills) compared with group 1 (average, 17 pills) and group 2 (average, 19 pills). Overall, these findings did not support the authors' hypothesis that peripheral nerve blocks are superior in terms of postoperative pain control and opioid consumption. Although there were advantages regarding opioid consumption and pain control with liposomal bupivacaine, these were limited to the first POD. The effectiveness of each modality, as well as potential risks and costs, should be considered when determining the optimal strategy. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(3):e410-e415.].
单纯的大多角骨切除术或联合悬吊成形术是治疗有症状的拇指腕掌关节关节炎的常见手术方法。作者进行了一项前瞻性对照研究,以验证以下假设:在疼痛评分和阿片类药物片消耗量方面,外周神经阻滞比布比卡因或脂质体布比卡因局部麻醉能提供更好的疼痛控制。选择接受腕掌关节置换术的患者被分配到3个术后疼痛管理组中的1组:(1)外周神经阻滞,(2)布比卡因局部麻醉,或(3)脂质体布比卡因局部麻醉。记录术后前5天(POD)的阿片类药物片总消耗量和视觉模拟评分疼痛评分。共纳入78例患者,外周神经阻滞组、布比卡因组和脂质体布比卡因组分别有27例、23例和28例患者。从POD 0到POD 1,所有组的阿片类药物片消耗量和视觉模拟评分疼痛评分均有所增加。从POD 0到POD 2,第3组术后视觉模拟评分疼痛评分最低。除POD 0外,第1组的平均视觉模拟评分疼痛评分最高。POD 2后,所有组的视觉模拟评分疼痛评分均恢复正常,此后均匀下降。与第1组(平均17片)和第2组(平均19片)相比,第3组的阿片类药物总消耗量最低(平均11片)。总体而言,这些发现不支持作者关于外周神经阻滞在术后疼痛控制和阿片类药物消耗量方面更具优势的假设。尽管脂质体布比卡因在阿片类药物消耗量和疼痛控制方面有优势,但这些优势仅限于术后第1天。在确定最佳策略时,应考虑每种方式的有效性以及潜在风险和成本。[《骨科》。2018;41(3):e410 - e415。]