• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下生殖道肿瘤女性患者的分析细胞学检测与高分辨率肛门镜检查和组织学检查的对比分析。

Performance of Anal Cytology Compared With High-Resolution Anoscopy and Histology in Women With Lower Anogenital Tract Neoplasia.

机构信息

Homerton Anal Neoplasia Service, Homerton University Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 28;67(8):1262-1268. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy273.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciy273
PMID:29659752
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information on the performance of anal cytology in women who are high risk for human papillomavirus-related lesions and the factors that might influence cytology are largely lacking.

METHODS

Retrospective study including all new referrals of women with a previous history of anogenital neoplasia from January 2012 to July 2017, with concomitant anal cytology and high-resolution anoscopy with or without biopsies.

RESULTS

Six hundred and thirty six anal cytology samples and 323 biopsies obtained from 278 women were included. Overall sensitivity and specificity of "any abnormality" on anal cytology to predict any abnormality in histology was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-54%) and 84% (95% CI, 73%-91%), respectively. For detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL)/cancer, sensitivity was 71% (95% CI, 61%-79%) and specificity was 73% (95% CI, 66%-79%). There was a poor concordance between cytological and histological grades (κ = 0.147). Cytology had a higher sensitivity to predict HSIL/cancer in immunosuppressed vs nonimmunosuppressed patients (92% vs 60%, P = .002). The sensitivity for HSIL detection was higher when 2 or more quadrants were affected compared with 1 (86% vs 57%, P = .006). A previous history of vulvar HSIL/cancer (odds ratio [OR], 1.71, 1.08-2.73; P = .023), immunosuppression (OR, 1.88, 1.17-3.03; P = .009), and concomitant genital HSIL/cancer (OR, 2.51, 1.47-4.29; P = .001) were risk factors for abnormal cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

Women characteristics can influence the performance of anal cytology. The sensitivity for detecting anal HSIL/cancer was higher in those immunosuppressed and with more extensive disease.

摘要

背景

有关人乳头瘤病毒相关病变高危女性的肛门细胞学表现以及可能影响细胞学的因素的信息在很大程度上尚不清楚。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月期间因肛门生殖器肿瘤病史而新转诊的所有女性,她们均进行了肛门细胞学检查和高分辨率肛门镜检查(伴或不伴活检)。

结果

共纳入 278 例女性的 636 例肛门细胞学样本和 323 例活检。肛门细胞学检查“任何异常”预测组织学任何异常的总敏感性和特异性分别为 47%(95%CI,41%-54%)和 84%(95%CI,73%-91%)。对于检测高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)/癌症,敏感性为 71%(95%CI,61%-79%),特异性为 73%(95%CI,66%-79%)。细胞学和组织学分级之间一致性较差(κ=0.147)。与非免疫抑制患者相比,免疫抑制患者的细胞学检查对 HSIL/癌症的预测敏感性更高(92%比 60%,P=0.002)。当 2 个或更多象限受累时,HSIL 检测的敏感性高于 1 个象限(86%比 57%,P=0.006)。外阴 HSIL/癌症史(比值比[OR],1.71,1.08-2.73;P=0.023)、免疫抑制(OR,1.88,1.17-3.03;P=0.009)和同时存在生殖器 HSIL/癌症(OR,2.51,1.47-4.29;P=0.001)是细胞学异常的危险因素。

结论

女性特征可能会影响肛门细胞学检查的表现。在免疫抑制和疾病范围较广的患者中,检测肛门 HSIL/癌症的敏感性更高。

相似文献

1
Performance of Anal Cytology Compared With High-Resolution Anoscopy and Histology in Women With Lower Anogenital Tract Neoplasia.下生殖道肿瘤女性患者的分析细胞学检测与高分辨率肛门镜检查和组织学检查的对比分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 28;67(8):1262-1268. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy273.
2
Prevalence of abnormal anal cytology and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions among a cohort of HIV-infected men who have sex with men.HIV 感染的男男性行为人群中异常肛门细胞学和高级别鳞状上皮内病变的流行率。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Apr;57(4):475-81. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000095.
3
A six-year experience with anal cytology in women with HPV in the lower genital tract: utility, limitations, and clinical correlation.一项针对下生殖道感染人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)女性的肛门细胞学检查的六年经验:实用性、局限性及临床相关性。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2014 May;42(5):396-400. doi: 10.1002/dc.23050. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
4
High Rates of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in HIV-Infected Women Who Do Not Meet Screening Guidelines.未达筛查指南标准的HIV感染女性肛管高级别鳞状上皮内病变发生率高。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 1;64(3):289-294. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw729. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
5
Performance characteristics of anal cytology and human papillomavirus testing in patients with high-resolution anoscopy-guided biopsy of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia.在高分辨率肛门镜引导下对高级别肛门上皮内瘤变患者进行活检时,肛门细胞学检查和人乳头瘤病毒检测的性能特征。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Feb;52(2):239-47. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819793d9.
6
Comparison of two sample collection devices for anal cytology in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: Cytology brush and Dacron swab.比较两种用于 HIV 阳性男男性行为者肛门细胞学检查的样本采集装置:细胞学刷子和 Dacron 拭子。
Cytopathology. 2021 Sep;32(5):646-653. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13013. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
7
The role of polymerase chain reaction of high-risk human papilloma virus in the screening of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in the anal mucosa of human immunodeficiency virus-positive males having sex with males.高危型人乳头瘤病毒聚合酶链反应在男性艾滋病病毒阳性男男性行为者肛门黏膜高级别鳞状上皮内病变筛查中的作用
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0123590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123590. eCollection 2015.
8
Assessment of Anal Cancer Screening Tools in Detecting High-Grade Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Women.评估肛门癌筛查工具在女性中检测高级别肛门鳞状上皮内病变的效果。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Jan;24(1):75-81. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000497.
9
Evaluating the performance of anal cytology and high-risk HPV genotyping for detecting anal HSIL in a clinic-based sample of people living with and without HIV in Puerto Rico.评估肛门细胞学和高危型 HPV 基因分型在波多黎各艾滋病毒感染者和非感染者临床样本中检测肛门 HSIL 的性能。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Oct;131(10):655-664. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22738. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
10
Anal Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Women With a History of Lower Genital Tract Neoplasia Compared With Low-Risk Women.与低风险女性相比,有下生殖道肿瘤病史女性的肛门细胞学检查和人乳头瘤病毒基因分型
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1294-1300. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001135.

引用本文的文献

1
PAP-HPV Co-Testing in Anal Cancer Screening: An Italian Experience.肛门癌筛查中的PAP-HPV联合检测:意大利经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 23;14(7):2186. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072186.
2
Artificial Intelligence in Coloproctology: A Review of Emerging Technologies and Clinical Applications.结直肠外科学中的人工智能:新兴技术与临床应用综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 30;13(19):5842. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195842.
3
Deep Learning in High-Resolution Anoscopy: Assessing the Impact of Staining and Therapeutic Manipulation on Automated Detection of Anal Cancer Precursors.
高分辨率肛门镜检查中的深度学习:评估染色和治疗操作对肛门癌前病变自动检测的影响
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 1;15(4):e00681. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000681.
4
Anal Cancer and Anal Cancer Screening.肛门癌与肛门癌筛查。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep 1;66(3):516-533. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000789. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
Evaluating the performance of anal cytology and high-risk HPV genotyping for detecting anal HSIL in a clinic-based sample of people living with and without HIV in Puerto Rico.评估肛门细胞学和高危型 HPV 基因分型在波多黎各艾滋病毒感染者和非感染者临床样本中检测肛门 HSIL 的性能。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Oct;131(10):655-664. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22738. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
Anal Cancer in High-Risk Women: The Lost Tribe.高危女性中的肛管癌:被忽视的群体。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;15(1):60. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010060.
7
Artificial intelligence and high-resolution anoscopy: automatic identification of anal squamous cell carcinoma precursors using a convolutional neural network.人工智能与高分辨率肛门镜检查:使用卷积神经网络自动识别肛门鳞状细胞癌前体
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Nov;26(11):893-900. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02684-z. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
8
Prevention and Screening of HPV Malignancies.HPV 相关恶性肿瘤的预防与筛查
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2021 Oct;31(4):297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.02.011.
9
Assessment of Anal Cancer Screening Tools in Detecting High-Grade Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Women.评估肛门癌筛查工具在女性中检测高级别肛门鳞状上皮内病变的效果。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Jan;24(1):75-81. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000497.
10
Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.支持肛门细胞学检查作为肛门癌筛查方法的推荐意见:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Dec 4;11(12):1942. doi: 10.3390/cancers11121942.