Department of Cardiology, Charité Berlin - University Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jul 1;103(7):2522-2533. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02772.
Insulin resistance has been linked to development and progression of atherosclerosis and is present in most patients with type 2 diabetes. Whether the degree of insulin resistance predicts adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is uncertain.
The Effect of Aleglitazar on Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus trial compared the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/γ agonist aleglitazar with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent ACS. In participants not treated with insulin, we determined whether baseline homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; n = 4303) or the change in HOMA-IR on assigned study treatment (n = 3568) was related to the risk of death or major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) in unadjusted and adjusted models. Because an inverse association of HOMA-IR with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been described, we specifically examined effects of adjustment for the latter.
In unadjusted analysis, twofold higher baseline HOMA-IR was associated with lower risk of death [hazard ratio (HR): 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.91, P = 0.002]. Adjustment for 24 standard demographic and clinical variables had minimal effect on this association. However, after further adjustment for NT-proBNP, the association of HOMA-IR with death was no longer present (adjusted HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.19, P = 0.94). Baseline HOMA-IR was not associated with major adverse cardiovascular events, nor was the change in HOMA-IR on study treatment associated with death or major adverse cardiovascular events.
After accounting for levels of NT-proBNP, insulin resistance assessed by HOMA-IR is not related to the risk of death or major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes and ACS.
胰岛素抵抗与动脉粥样硬化的发生和进展有关,大多数 2 型糖尿病患者都存在胰岛素抵抗。在患有 2 型糖尿病和急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的患者中,胰岛素抵抗的程度是否可以预测不良结局尚不确定。
在 2 型糖尿病伴近期 ACS 患者中,比较过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体-α/γ激动剂阿格列汀与安慰剂的 Effect of Aleglitazar on Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 试验,纳入了未接受胰岛素治疗的患者,我们在未调整和调整模型中确定了基线稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR;n=4303)或在分配的研究治疗期间 HOMA-IR 的变化(n=3568)与死亡或主要不良心血管事件(心血管死亡、心肌梗死和中风)的风险之间是否存在相关性。由于已经描述了 HOMA-IR 与 N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)之间的反比关系,我们特别检查了调整后者的影响。
在未调整分析中,基线 HOMA-IR 升高两倍与死亡风险降低相关[风险比(HR):0.79,95%置信区间:0.68 至 0.91,P=0.002]。对 24 个标准人口统计学和临床变量进行调整对这种关联的影响很小。然而,在进一步调整 NT-proBNP 后,HOMA-IR 与死亡的关联不再存在(调整后的 HR:0.99,95%置信区间:0.83 至 1.19,P=0.94)。基线 HOMA-IR 与主要不良心血管事件无关,研究治疗期间 HOMA-IR 的变化也与死亡或主要不良心血管事件无关。
在考虑 NT-proBNP 水平后,HOMA-IR 评估的胰岛素抵抗与 2 型糖尿病和 ACS 患者的死亡或主要不良心血管事件风险无关。