Suppr超能文献

全身性炎症反应综合征标准及其与死亡率的差异相关性。

The systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and their differential association with mortality.

机构信息

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2018 Aug;46:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite the recent Sepsis-3 consensus, the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria continue to be assessed and recommended. Such use implies equivalence and interchangeability of criteria. Thus, we aimed to test whether such criteria are indeed equivalent and interchangeable.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2000 to 2015, we identified patients with infection, organ failure, and at least one SIRS criterion in 179 Intensive Care Units in Australia and New. Zealand. We studied the association of different SIRS criteria with hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among 131,016 patients with infection and organ failure, mortality increased from 10.6% for the respiratory rate criterion to 15.8% for the heart rate criterion (P<0.01); from 10.1% for the high leukocyte count criterion to 20.0% for a low count and from 10.1% for a high temperature to 14.4% for a low temperature criterion. With any two SIRS criteria, hospital mortality varied from 11.5% to 30.8% depending on the combination of criteria. This difference remained unchanged after adjustments and was consistent over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Different individual and combinations of SIRS criteria were associated with marked differences in hospital mortality. These differences remained unchanged after adjustment and over time and imply that individual SIRS criteria are not equivalent or interchangeable.

摘要

目的

尽管最近有了《脓毒症-3 共识》,但全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准仍在被评估和推荐。这种使用意味着标准具有等效性和可互换性。因此,我们旨在测试这些标准是否确实等效和可互换。

材料和方法

从 2000 年到 2015 年,我们在澳大利亚和新西兰的 179 个重症监护病房中确定了感染、器官衰竭和至少一个 SIRS 标准的患者。我们研究了不同 SIRS 标准与医院死亡率的相关性。

结果

在 131016 名感染和器官衰竭的患者中,死亡率从呼吸频率标准的 10.6%增加到心率标准的 15.8%(P<0.01);从白细胞计数高的标准的 10.1%增加到计数低的标准的 20.0%,从高温的标准的 10.1%增加到低温的标准的 14.4%。有任何两个 SIRS 标准,医院死亡率根据标准的组合从 11.5%到 30.8%不等。调整后,这种差异保持不变,并且随着时间的推移保持一致。

结论

不同的个体和 SIRS 标准组合与医院死亡率的显著差异相关。这些差异在调整后和随着时间的推移保持不变,这意味着单个 SIRS 标准不是等效或可互换的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验