• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2011 年至 2014 年中国西部陕西省农村地区门诊自费支出的差异:时间序列分析。

Disparities in out-of-pocket inpatient expenditures in rural Shaanxi Province, western China from 2011 to 2014: a time series analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Center for Drug Safety and Policy Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Jun;23(6):661-667. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13060. Epub 2018 May 2.

DOI:10.1111/tmi.13060
PMID:29660766
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term trend of disparity of monthly average out-of-pocket inpatient expenditures (OOP) between areas with different developing levels since the new healthcare reform.

METHODS

Time series regression was used to assess the trend of disparities of OOP and monthly average inpatient expenditures (AIE) between areas with different developing levels in rural Shaanxi Province, western China. The data of OOP and AIE in primary health institutions, secondary hospitals, tertiary hospitals and also all levels of the hospital were analysed separately covering the period 2011 through to 2014.

RESULTS

The disparity of AIE at all levels of hospitals was increasing (coefficient = 0.003, P = 0.029), and only the disparity of AIE in secondary hospitals was statistical significant (coefficient = 0.003, P = 0.012) when separately considering different levels of the hospital. The disparity of OOP in all levels of the hospital was increasing (coefficient = 0.007, P = 0.001), and the OOP in primary hospitals contributed most of the disparity (coefficient = 0.019, P = 0.000), followed by OOP in secondary (coefficient = 0.008, P = 0.003) and tertiary hospitals (coefficient = 0.004, P = 0.091).

CONCLUSIONS

A statistically significant absolute increase in the trend of disparities of OOP and AIE at all levels of hospital was detected after the new healthcare reform in Shaanxi Province, western China. The increase rate of disparity of OOP was bigger than that of AIE. A modified health insurance plan should be proposed to guarantee equity in the future.

摘要

目的

自新医改以来,研究不同发展水平地区月度平均自付住院费用(OOP)差距的长期趋势。

方法

采用时间序列回归方法,评估中国西部陕西省不同发展水平地区农村地区 OOP 和月度平均住院费用(AIE)差距的变化趋势。分析了 2011 年至 2014 年期间基层医疗机构、二级医院、三级医院和各级医院的 OOP 和 AIE 数据。

结果

各级医院 AIE 的差异呈上升趋势(系数=0.003,P=0.029),单独考虑不同级别医院时,仅二级医院 AIE 的差异具有统计学意义(系数=0.003,P=0.012)。各级医院 OOP 的差异呈上升趋势(系数=0.007,P=0.001),基层医院 OOP 的差异最大(系数=0.019,P=0.000),其次是二级(系数=0.008,P=0.003)和三级医院(系数=0.004,P=0.091)。

结论

在中国西部陕西省新医改后,检测到各级医院 OOP 和 AIE 差距的趋势呈显著的绝对增加。OOP 差距的增长率大于 AIE 差距的增长率。未来应提出一项经修正的医疗保险计划,以保证公平性。

相似文献

1
Disparities in out-of-pocket inpatient expenditures in rural Shaanxi Province, western China from 2011 to 2014: a time series analysis.2011 年至 2014 年中国西部陕西省农村地区门诊自费支出的差异:时间序列分析。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Jun;23(6):661-667. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13060. Epub 2018 May 2.
2
Reducing out-of-pocket expenditures to reduce poverty: a disaggregated analysis at rural-urban and state level in India.减少自付费用以减少贫困:印度城乡和邦层面的分类分析
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Mar;24(2):116-28. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn046. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
3
Effect of a typical systemic hospital reform on inpatient expenditure for rural population: the Sanming model in China.一项典型的系统性医院改革对农村居民住院费用的影响:中国三明模式
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4048-7.
4
Inequity in healthcare needs, health service use and financial burden of medical expenditures in China: results from a consecutive household monitoring study in Jiangsu Province.中国医疗保健需求、卫生服务利用和医疗支出经济负担的不公平性:来自江苏省连续家庭监测研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 16;19(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4796-4.
5
Health reform and out-of-pocket payments: lessons from China.医疗改革与自付费用:来自中国的经验教训。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Mar;29(2):217-26. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt006. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
6
The effects of global budget on cost control and readmission in rural China: a difference-in-difference analysis.全球预算对中国农村地区成本控制和再入院率的影响:一项双重差分分析
J Med Econ. 2017 Sep;20(9):903-910. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1336448. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
Impact of Critical Illness Insurance on the Burden of High-Cost Rural Residents in Central China: An Interrupted Time Series Study.重大疾病保险对华中地区农村高费用居民负担的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 20;16(19):3528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193528.
8
Does health insurance reduce out-of-pocket expenditure? Heterogeneity among China's middle-aged and elderly.医疗保险是否降低了自付支出?中国中老年群体的异质性。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;190:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
9
New cooperative medical scheme decreased financial burden but expanded the gap of income-related inequity: evidence from three provinces in rural China.新型农村合作医疗减轻了经济负担,但扩大了收入相关不公平差距:来自中国农村三个省份的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 May 4;15:72. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0361-5.
10
Out-of-Pocket Spending for Ambulatory Physical Therapy Services From 2008 to 2012: National Panel Survey.2008年至2012年门诊物理治疗服务的自付费用:全国性抽样调查
Phys Ther. 2015 Dec;95(12):1680-91. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150018. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
What has driven the spatial spillover of China's out-of-pocket payments?中国自付费用的空间溢出是什么驱动的?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4451-0.