Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hilleroed, Denmark.
Department of Intensive Care 4131, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Aug;62(7):936-944. doi: 10.1111/aas.13124. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
Accumulation of fluids is frequent in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute kidney injury and may be associated with increased mortality and decreased renal recovery. We present the results of a pilot trial assessing the feasibility of forced fluid removal in ICU patients with acute kidney injury and fluid accumulation of more than 10% ideal bodyweight.
The FFAKI-trial was a pilot trial of forced fluid removal vs standard care in adult ICU patients with moderate to high risk acute kidney injury and 10% fluid accumulation. Fluid removal was done with furosemide and/or continuous renal replacement therapy aiming at net negative fluid balance > 1 mL/kg ideal body weight/hour until cumulative fluid balance calculated from ICU admission reached less than 1000 mL.
After 20 months, we stopped the trial prematurely due to a low inclusion rate with 23 (2%) included patients out of the 1144 screened. Despite the reduced sample size, we observed a marked reduction in cumulative fluid balance 5 days after randomisation (mean difference -5814 mL, 95% CI -2063 to -9565, P = .003) with forced fluid removal compared to standard care. While the trial was underpowered for clinical endpoints, no point estimates suggested harm from forced fluid removal.
Forced fluid removal aiming at 1 mL/kg ideal body weight/hour may be an effective treatment of fluid accumulation in ICU patients with acute kidney injury. A definitive trial using our inclusion criteria seems less feasible based on our inclusion rate of only 2%.
在伴有急性肾损伤的重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,液体蓄积很常见,并且可能与死亡率增加和肾功能恢复减少有关。我们报告了一项评估在伴有急性肾损伤且液体蓄积超过理想体重 10%的 ICU 患者中进行强制液体清除的可行性的试验结果。
FFAKI 试验是一项关于强制液体清除与标准治疗在中高危急性肾损伤和 10%液体蓄积的 ICU 成年患者中的比较的试验。使用呋塞米和/或连续肾脏替代疗法进行液体清除,目标是净负液体平衡>1mL/kg 理想体重/小时,直到从 ICU 入院开始计算的累积液体平衡达到<1000mL。
经过 20 个月后,由于纳入率低(筛选出的 1144 例患者中仅纳入了 23 例(2%)),我们提前终止了试验。尽管样本量减少,但与标准治疗相比,我们观察到随机分组后第 5 天的累积液体平衡明显减少(平均差异-5814mL,95%CI-2063 至-9565,P=0.003)。尽管该试验在临床终点方面的效能较低,但没有任何点估计表明强制液体清除有危害。
以 1mL/kg 理想体重/小时的目标进行强制液体清除可能是急性肾损伤的 ICU 患者中治疗液体蓄积的有效方法。基于我们仅 2%的纳入率,使用我们的纳入标准进行的确定性试验似乎不太可行。