Angle Orthod. 2018 Jul;88(4):483-493. doi: 10.2319/111117-770.1. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
To assess the scientific evidence regarding the influence of reminder therapy on plaque index, gingival index, and white spots in patients subjected to orthodontic treatment.
Randomized clinical trials were searched in the electronic databases LILACS, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, LIVIVO, and Cochrane Library. The databases OpenThesis and OpenGrey were used to capture the "gray literature," preventing selection and publication biases. The risk of bias was assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials tool. The software Review Manager was used for the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity among studies was assessed through the I statistic. A summary of the overall strength of evidence available was assessed using the Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool.
A total of 332 records were found, from which only 7 articles met the inclusion criteria and were subjected to analysis. Reminder therapy showed improved scores for the plaque index (standardized mean difference = -1.22; 95% confidence interval = -2.03 to -0.42; P = .003) and the gingival index (standardized mean difference = 1.49; 95% confidence interval = -2.61 to 0.37; P = .009). Moreover, there was lower occurrence of white spots (relative risk = 0.53; 95% confidence interval = 0.38 to 0.74; P < .001) when reminder therapy was implemented.
According to the existing high-quality evidence, reminder therapy is a valuable strategy and may contribute to the reduction of plaque and gingival indices as well as to the lower occurrence of white spots in patients subjected to orthodontic treatment.
评估提醒疗法对接受正畸治疗患者的菌斑指数、牙龈指数和白斑影响的科学证据。
在 LILACS、PubMed、SciELO、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase、LIVIVO 和 Cochrane Library 电子数据库中检索随机临床试验。使用 OpenThesis 和 OpenGrey 数据库捕获“灰色文献”,以防止选择和发表偏倚。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所随机对照试验批判性评价清单评估偏倚风险。使用 Review Manager 软件进行荟萃分析。通过 I ² 统计量评估研究之间的异质性。使用推荐评估、制定与评价工具(Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool)评估现有证据总体强度的总结。
共发现 332 条记录,其中只有 7 篇文章符合纳入标准并进行了分析。提醒疗法显示出菌斑指数(标准化均数差 = -1.22;95%置信区间 = -2.03 至 -0.42;P =.003)和牙龈指数(标准化均数差 = 1.49;95%置信区间 = -2.61 至 0.37;P =.009)的评分得到改善。此外,当实施提醒疗法时,白斑的发生几率较低(相对风险 = 0.53;95%置信区间 = 0.38 至 0.74;P <.001)。
根据现有的高质量证据,提醒疗法是一种有价值的策略,可能有助于减少接受正畸治疗患者的菌斑和牙龈指数,并降低白斑的发生几率。