Bale A
Center for Mental Health Service Research, Yale Psychiatric Institute, New Haven CT 06519.
Am J Ind Med. 1988;13(4):499-513. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700130409.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, new knowledge of work-related illness became part of discourses in several institutional spheres on the relationship between aspects of the economy and workers' health. Appeals courts and state legislatures invoked this knowledge in their deliberations on legislation to ease the coercive aspects of the employment relationship. Insurers used the knowledge to help determine what types of coverage would be available to different occupational groups. In the courts, a narrow compensation remedy evolved for illness caused by employers' failure to warn of latent risks. This small, legal zone of protection of workers' health was separated out from the massive amount of uncompensated, preventable work-related illness.
在19世纪末和20世纪初,与工作相关疾病的新知识成为了几个机构领域中关于经济方面与工人健康之间关系的讨论内容。上诉法院和州立法机构在审议旨在减轻雇佣关系中强制性方面的立法时援引了这一知识。保险公司利用这一知识来帮助确定不同职业群体可获得何种类型的保险。在法庭上,针对雇主未警告潜在风险导致的疾病,逐渐形成了一种狭义的赔偿补救措施。工人健康的这一狭小法律保护范围,与大量未得到赔偿的、可预防的与工作相关的疾病区分开来。