Jones I H, Riley W T
Melbourne University Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Vic.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1987 Dec;21(4):560-7. doi: 10.3109/00048678709158924.
Three hundred and twenty-seven subjects involved in civil accident litigation and referred by solicitors for either plaintiff or defendant were examined. A precise psychiatric diagnosis was applicable in only a minority of subjects, although psychiatric symptoms, including pain, anxiety and depression, were prominent. Overall the clinical picture was an amorphous one. Cluster analysis was performed to examine a variety of clinical, demographic and historical variables. This showed four stable groups, which are here described as: stoic, depressive, phobic motor accident and prior claimants. It is suggested that the phenomenological approach taken here, paying particular attention to clinical sub-groups, may be a more useful route towards the understanding and treatment of post-accident psychiatric disturbance than is the existing but confused approach, in which motivation has been a prime focus of interest. The particular sub-groups demonstrated here, if replicated, could form the basis for such an approach.
对327名卷入民事事故诉讼并由律师转介给原告或被告的受试者进行了检查。尽管包括疼痛、焦虑和抑郁在内的精神症状很突出,但只有少数受试者能够做出精确的精神科诊断。总体而言,临床表现是模糊不清的。进行了聚类分析以检验各种临床、人口统计学和病史变量。结果显示有四个稳定的组,这里将其描述为:坚忍型、抑郁型、恐惧性机动车事故型和先前索赔者型。有人认为,这里采用的现象学方法,特别关注临床亚组,可能比现有的但混乱的方法更有助于理解和治疗事故后精神障碍,在现有方法中,动机一直是主要关注焦点。这里展示的特定亚组如果能够复制,可为这种方法奠定基础。