Dattoli Serena, Colucci Mariele, Soave Maria Grazia, De Santis Rita, Segaletti Leandro, Corsi Claudia, Tofani Marco, Valente Donatella, Galeoto Giovanni
Sapienya University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Invacare Rome, Rome, Italy.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Mar;43(2):185-192. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1456768. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
Compare three commercially available postural systems to determine the best for treatment of patients suffering from spinal cord injury lesion below the cervical spine.
Outcome Research.
Ambulatory.
Thirteen patients were recruited for this study between March 2016 and July 2016 from the Occupational Therapy clinic of "Policlinico Umberto I" hospital in Rome and Occupational Therapy of "CPO" hospital in Ostia. The patient samples consisted of eleven men (84.6%) and two women (15.4%). All the patient are suffering by SCI with a lesion below the cervical spine.
We evaluate postural systems customized by three different companies. Patients tried each pelvis device for a duration of one week, after which they have been asked to fill in questionnaire concerning static stability, temperature, movement adaptability, transfers and dynamical stability during the activities of every-day life. The impact on the health status has been evaluated by means of a further questionnaire (Health Status Scale SF-12) submitted to the patients.
Quality of life and daily life activities.
The analysis of the data from the questionnaire, along with those of objective nature associated with the mapping of the pressure due to weight distribution, has allowed the selection of the most appropriate clinical solution.
This study has allowed two significant conclusions: the central role of the interplay between the patient and occupational therapist in the decision role and the clear evidence that patients with spinal cord injury felt definite differences between cushion stability and were able to indicate a specific typology providing the best satisfaction.
比较三种市售的体位系统,以确定最适合治疗颈椎以下脊髓损伤患者的系统。
结果研究。
门诊。
2016年3月至2016年7月期间,从罗马“翁贝托一世综合医院”职业治疗诊所和奥斯蒂亚“CPO医院”职业治疗科招募了13名患者。患者样本包括11名男性(84.6%)和2名女性(15.4%)。所有患者均患有颈椎以下损伤的脊髓损伤。
我们评估了由三家不同公司定制 的体位系统。患者试用每种骨盆装置一周,之后要求他们填写关于静态稳定性、温度、运动适应性、转移以及日常生活活动中的动态稳定性的问卷。通过向患者提交的另一份问卷(健康状况量表SF - 12)评估对健康状况的影响。
生活质量和日常生活活动。
对问卷数据以及与体重分布压力映射相关的客观数据的分析,有助于选择最合适的临床解决方案。
本研究得出了两个重要结论:患者与职业治疗师之间的相互作用在决策中起核心作用;有明确证据表明,脊髓损伤患者在坐垫稳定性方面明显感受到差异,并且能够指出提供最佳满意度的特定类型。