Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD United States of America.
Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0195012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195012. eCollection 2018.
For nearly a century, no generic form of insulin has been available in the United States. However, the first biosimilar insulin, Basaglar, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2015, and subsequently Admelog and Lusduna in 2017.
To summarize the scientific evidence comparing the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar and reference insulin products.
We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Latin America and Caribbean Health Sciences, South Asian Database of Controlled Clinical Trials, and IndiaMED from their inception through January 14, 2018.
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing safety, clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of any biosimilar insulin with a reference product in adults regardless of sample size and location.
Two researchers independently reviewed all titles, abstracts and text; extracted data; and performed quality assessments.
Efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar and reference insulin products.
Of 6945 articles screened, 11 studies were included in the data synthesis. LY2963016, Basalog, Basalin, and MK-1293 were compared to Lantus while SAR342434 was compared to Humalog. Three trials enrolled healthy volunteers, five enrolled type 1 diabetics, and two enrolled type 2 diabetics. One study enrolled both healthy and type 1 diabetics. Of the eleven studies, six examined pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic parameters and five examined clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. All studies included adverse events. All PK and/or PD studies showed that comparable parameters of biosimilar and reference products were within the pre-specified equivalence margins. Clinical studies suggested similar clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. Adverse events were similar between the groups across all studies.
Few published studies have compared biosimilar and reference insulins, though those that did suggest that the biosimilars have comparable safety and clinical efficacy as its reference product.
近一个世纪以来,美国一直没有通用的胰岛素仿制药。然而,美国食品和药物管理局于 2015 年批准了首个生物类似胰岛素 Basaglar,随后分别于 2017 年批准了 Admelog 和 Lusduna。
总结比较生物类似胰岛素和参考胰岛素产品安全性、疗效、药代动力学和药效动力学的科学证据。
我们使用 PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学数据库、南亚对照临床试验数据库和印度医学文献数据库,从其成立到 2018 年 1 月 14 日进行了系统评价。
我们纳入了比较任何生物类似胰岛素与参考产品在成人中的安全性、临床疗效、药代动力学和药效动力学的随机对照试验(RCT),无论样本量和地点如何。
两名研究人员独立审查了所有标题、摘要和文本;提取数据;并进行了质量评估。
生物类似胰岛素和参考胰岛素产品的疗效、安全性、药代动力学和药效动力学。
在筛选出的 6945 篇文章中,有 11 项研究被纳入数据综合分析。LY2963016、Basalog、Basalin 和 MK-1293 与 Lantus 进行了比较,SAR342434 与 Humalog 进行了比较。三项试验纳入了健康志愿者,五项试验纳入了 1 型糖尿病患者,两项试验纳入了 2 型糖尿病患者。一项研究同时纳入了健康志愿者和 1 型糖尿病患者。在这 11 项研究中,有 6 项研究了药代动力学和/或药效动力学参数,5 项研究了临床疗效和免疫原性。所有研究均报告了不良事件。所有 PK 和/或 PD 研究均表明,生物类似物和参考产品的可比参数均在预先指定的等效范围内。临床研究表明,生物类似物和参考产品具有相似的临床疗效和免疫原性。所有研究中,不良事件在两组间相似。
尽管有少数已发表的研究比较了生物类似胰岛素和参考胰岛素,但这些研究表明生物类似胰岛素与参考产品具有相似的安全性和临床疗效。