• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全校范围多项选择题客观考试的项目分析:一所尼日利亚私立大学的经验

Item analysis of university-wide multiple choice objective examinations: the experience of a Nigerian private university.

作者信息

Odukoya Jonathan A, Adekeye Olajide, Igbinoba Angie O, Afolabi A

机构信息

Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria.

出版信息

Qual Quant. 2018;52(3):983-997. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0499-2. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11135-017-0499-2
PMID:29670303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5897464/
Abstract

Teachers and Students worldwide often dance to the tune of tests and examinations. Assessments are powerful tools for catalyzing the achievement of educational goals, especially if done rightly. One of the tools for 'doing it rightly' is item analysis. The core objectives for this study, therefore, were: ascertaining the item difficulty and distractive indices of the university wide courses. A range of 112-1956 undergraduate students participated in this study. With the use of secondary data, the ex-post facto design was adopted for this project. In virtually all cases, majority of the items (ranging between 65% and 97% of the 70 items fielded in each course) did not meet psychometric standard in terms of difficulty and distractive indices and consequently needed to be moderated or deleted. Considering the importance of these courses, the need to apply item analyses when developing these tests was emphasized.

摘要

世界各地的教师和学生常常随着考试的节奏起舞。评估是促进教育目标实现的有力工具,尤其是如果方法得当的话。“正确进行评估”的工具之一是项目分析。因此,本研究的核心目标是:确定全校课程的项目难度和干扰指数。112至1956名本科生参与了本研究。利用二手数据,本项目采用事后设计。实际上在所有情况下,大多数项目(每门课程设置的70个项目中,占比在65%至97%之间)在难度和干扰指数方面都不符合心理测量标准,因此需要进行调整或删除。考虑到这些课程的重要性,强调了在开发这些测试时应用项目分析的必要性。

相似文献

1
Item analysis of university-wide multiple choice objective examinations: the experience of a Nigerian private university.全校范围多项选择题客观考试的项目分析:一所尼日利亚私立大学的经验
Qual Quant. 2018;52(3):983-997. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0499-2. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
2
The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.违反标准试题编写原则对考试及学生的影响:医学教育中使用有缺陷的试题对成绩考试的后果。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005;10(2):133-43. doi: 10.1007/s10459-004-4019-5.
3
The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.图像对多项选择题解剖学考试中题目统计数据的影响。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Jan;10(1):68-78. doi: 10.1002/ase.1637. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
4
Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions in Teaching Prosthodontics.口腔修复学教学中选择题的项目分析
J Dent Educ. 2015 Nov;79(11):1314-9.
5
Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.一幅图胜过千言万语:组织学选择题中带插图与纯文本小病例的难度及区分度参数分析
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Oct 26;15:184. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0452-9.
6
Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments.高风险护理评估中多项选择题的命题缺陷对学生成绩的影响。
Med Educ. 2008 Feb;42(2):198-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02957.x.
7
Are faculty predictions or item taxonomies useful for estimating the outcome of multiple-choice examinations?教师预测或项目分类对于估计多项选择题考试的结果是否有用?
Adv Physiol Educ. 2011 Dec;35(4):396-401. doi: 10.1152/advan.00062.2011.
8
Do item-writing flaws reduce examinations psychometric quality?试题编写缺陷会降低考试的心理测量学质量吗?
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Aug 11;9(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2202-4.
9
Psychometric analysis of multiple-choice questions in an innovative curriculum in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯王国创新课程中多项选择题的心理测量分析
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jul 30;9(7):3663-3668. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_358_20. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Difficulty and discrimination indices of multiple-choice examination items in a college of pharmacy therapeutics and pathophysiology course sequence.药学院治疗学与病理生理学课程系列中多项选择题考试项目的难度和区分度指标
Int J Pharm Pract. 2014 Feb;22(1):76-83. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12022. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and validation of the childbearing questionnaire for the nursing population in the context of China's three-child policy: a multicenter cross-sectional study.中国三孩政策背景下护理人群生育问卷的翻译与验证:一项多中心横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 7;24(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03539-2.
2
Evaluating the multiple-choice questions quality at the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia: a three-year experience.评估沙特阿拉伯比沙大学医学院多项选择题的质量:三年经验
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06700-2.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the German social support questionnaire among older adults with chronic diseases.慢性病老年患者中文版德国社会支持问卷的跨文化调适及心理测量特性。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05303-8.
4
Translation and psychometric validation of the Patient Participation Culture Tool for healthcare workers in Chinese nursing context.《患者参与文化工具》在中国护理背景下针对医护人员的翻译及心理测量学验证
BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 15;23(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02065-x.
5
Translation and validation: standard Chinese version of the skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES).翻译与验证:皮肤撕裂知识评估工具(OASES)的标准中文版
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jan 4;10(3):100183. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100183. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Evaluating knowledge and attitudes scales for the care of older adults among nursing students in Ghana.评估加纳护理专业学生对老年人护理的知识和态度量表。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Feb 21;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01195-y.
7
Psychometric properties of the Postpartum Depression Literacy Scale (PoDLiS) among Chinese perinatal women: a cross-sectional study.中文版产后抑郁知识量表(PoDLiS)在中国围产期女性中的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 2;22(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05067-2.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the postpartum depression literacy scale.产后抑郁知识量表中文版的跨文化适应及心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 9;13:966770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966770. eCollection 2022.
9
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perinatal Bereavement Care Confidence Scale (C-PBCCS) in nursing practice.中文版围生期丧亲护理信心量表在护理实践中的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262965. eCollection 2022.
10
Psychometric properties of the Breast Cancer Awareness Measurement among Chinese women: a cross-sectional study.中文版女性乳腺癌认知测量量表的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e035911. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035911.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of use of a single best answer format in an undergraduate medical examination.本科医学考试中单一最佳答案格式的使用分析。
Qatar Med J. 2013 Nov 1;2013(1):3-6. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2013.1. eCollection 2013.
2
Post-examination analysis of objective tests.检查后客观测试分析。
Med Teach. 2011;33(6):447-58. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.564682.