Suppr超能文献

根据心脏和呼吸周期的血流差异对三种类型的Fontan手术的影响

Impact of Flow Differentials According to Cardiac and Respiratory Cycles on Three Types of Fontan Operation.

作者信息

Ha Kee Soo, Choi Jae Young, Jung Jo Won, Kim Nam Kyun

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Pediatr Cardiol. 2018 Aug;39(6):1144-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00246-018-1872-1. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

Abstract

Few hemodynamic comparison studies on various types of Fontan operation have been reported. The objective of this study was to perform hemodynamic comparisons for flow size and volume in three types of Fontan operation: atriopulmonary connection (APC), lateral tunnel (LT), and extracardiac conduit (ECC). Forty patients with Fontan operation (8 with APC Fontan, 22 with LT Fontan, and 10 with ECC Fontan) were enrolled. Velocity time integral (VTI) and average peak velocity (APV) were assessed according to cardiac and respiratory cycles in SVC, IVC, hepatic vein, conduit, LPA, and RPA using direct intravenous Doppler echocardiography. During each cardiac cycle in APC, VTI and APV between inspiration and expiration did not show significant differences in SVC, IVC, HV, LPA, or RPA. During each cardiac cycle in LT and ECC, VTI and APV between inspiration and expiration showed significant differences in all native vessels. The gap between S and D wave in APC was the highest, followed by that in LT. It was the lowest in ECC regardless of inspiration or expiration. Hepatic reverse VTI and APV in APC showed significant decreases compared to those in VC and PA during inspiration and expiration. Flow size and volume in APC were more influenced by cardiac cycle. Those in LT were moderately influenced by both respiratory cycle and cardiac cycle while those in ECC were more influenced by respiratory cycle. APC Fontan has hemodynamic inefficiency with prominent reverse flow. However, total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) Fontan has more hemodynamic efficiency without prominent reverse flows.

摘要

关于各类Fontan手术的血流动力学比较研究报道较少。本研究的目的是对三种类型的Fontan手术(心房肺动脉连接术(APC)、侧隧道术(LT)和心外管道术(ECC))的血流大小和容量进行血流动力学比较。纳入了40例行Fontan手术的患者(8例行APC Fontan手术、22例行LT Fontan手术、10例行ECC Fontan手术)。使用直接静脉多普勒超声心动图,根据心脏和呼吸周期评估上腔静脉(SVC)、下腔静脉(IVC)、肝静脉、管道、左肺动脉(LPA)和右肺动脉(RPA)中的速度时间积分(VTI)和平均峰值速度(APV)。在APC手术的每个心动周期中,吸气和呼气之间的VTI和APV在SVC、IVC、肝静脉、LPA或RPA中未显示出显著差异。在LT和ECC手术的每个心动周期中,吸气和呼气之间的VTI和APV在所有天然血管中均显示出显著差异。APC中S波和D波之间的差距最大,其次是LT。无论吸气还是呼气,ECC中的差距最小。与吸气和呼气时的VC和PA相比,APC中的肝反向VTI和APV显著降低。APC中的血流大小和容量受心动周期的影响更大。LT中的血流大小和容量受呼吸周期和心动周期的中度影响,而ECC中的血流大小和容量受呼吸周期的影响更大。APC Fontan存在血流动力学效率低下且有明显的反向血流。然而,全腔肺连接(TCPC)Fontan具有更高的血流动力学效率且无明显的反向血流。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验