• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术量对唇腭裂修复手术结局及成本的影响:一项儿童住院患者数据库分析

The Impact of Surgical Volume on Outcomes and Cost in Cleft Repair: A Kids' Inpatient Database Analysis.

作者信息

Bucknor Alexandra, Chattha Anmol, Wu Winona, Egeler Sabine, Ultee Klaas, Afshar Salim, Lin Samuel J

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Apr;80(4 Suppl 4):S174-S177. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001388.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001388
PMID:29672335
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Centralization of specialist services, including cleft service delivery, is occurring worldwide with the aim of improving the outcomes. This study examines the relationship between hospital surgical volume in cleft palate repair and outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Kids' Inpatient Database was undertaken. Children 3 years or younger undergoing cleft palate repair in 2012 were identified. Hospital volume was categorized by cases per year as low volume (LV; 0-14), intermediate volume (IV; 15-46), or high volume (HV; 47-99); differences in complications, hospital costs, and length of stay (LOS) were determined by hospital volume.

RESULTS

Data for 2389 children were retrieved: 24.9% (n = 595) were LV, 50.1% (n = 1196) were IV, and 25.0% (n = 596) were HV. High-volume centers were more frequently located in the West (71.9%) compared with LV (19.9%) or IV (24.5%) centers (P < 0.001 for hospital region). Median household income was more commonly highest quartile in HV centers compared with IV or LV centers (32.3% vs 21.7% vs 18.1%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in complications between different volume centers (P = 0.74). Compared with HV centers, there was a significant decrease in mean costs for LV centers ($9682 vs $,378, P < 0.001) but no significant difference in cost for IV centers ($9260 vs $9682, P = 0.103). Both IV and LV centers had a significantly greater LOS when compared with HV centers (1.97 vs 2.10 vs 1.74, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improvement in LOS in HV centers, we did not find a reduction in cost in HV centers. Further research is needed with analysis of outpatient, long-term outcomes to ensure widespread cost-efficiency.

摘要

背景

包括腭裂治疗服务在内的专科服务集中化正在全球范围内展开,目的是改善治疗效果。本研究探讨腭裂修复手术量与治疗效果之间的关系。

方法

对儿童住院数据库进行回顾性分析。确定2012年接受腭裂修复手术的3岁及以下儿童。医院手术量按每年病例数分为低手术量(LV;0 - 14例)、中等手术量(IV;15 - 46例)或高手术量(HV;47 - 99例);根据医院手术量确定并发症、住院费用和住院时间(LOS)的差异。

结果

检索到2389名儿童的数据:24.9%(n = 595)为低手术量,50.1%(n = 1196)为中等手术量,25.0%(n = 596)为高手术量。与低手术量(19.9%)或中等手术量(24.5%)中心相比,高手术量中心更多位于西部(71.9%)(医院地区,P < 0.001)。与中等手术量或低手术量中心相比,高手术量中心家庭收入中位数更常见于最高四分位数(32.3%对21.7%对18.1%,P < 0.001)。不同手术量中心之间并发症无差异(P = 0.74)。与高手术量中心相比,低手术量中心平均费用显著降低(9682美元对9378美元,P < 0.001),但中等手术量中心费用无显著差异(9260美元对9682美元,P = 0.103)。与高手术量中心相比,中等手术量和低手术量中心住院时间均显著更长(1.97对2.10对1.74,P < 0.001)。

结论

尽管高手术量中心住院时间有所改善,但我们未发现高手术量中心成本降低。需要进一步研究分析门诊和长期治疗效果,以确保广泛的成本效益。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Surgical Volume on Outcomes and Cost in Cleft Repair: A Kids' Inpatient Database Analysis.手术量对唇腭裂修复手术结局及成本的影响:一项儿童住院患者数据库分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Apr;80(4 Suppl 4):S174-S177. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001388.
2
Cleft-Palate Repair: Does Hospital Case-Volume Impact Outcomes or Cost?腭裂修复术:医院手术量是否影响治疗效果或成本?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 May;141(5):1193-1200. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004292.
3
Cost of Major Complications After Liver Resection in the United States: Are High-volume Centers Cost-effective?美国肝切除术后主要并发症的成本:高容量中心是否具有成本效益?
Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):503-510. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002627.
4
Hospital volume and patient outcomes in hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery: is assessing differences in mortality enough?肝胰胆外科手术中的医院手术量与患者预后:仅评估死亡率差异是否足够?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Dec;18(12):2105-15. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2619-9. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
5
Hospital Volume Improves Primary, Revision, and Delayed Cleft Palate Repair.医院手术量提高了原发性、修复性和延迟性腭裂修复的效果。
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jun;30(4):1201-1205. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005270.
6
Treatment of Craniosynostosis: The Impact of Hospital Surgical Volume on Cost, Resource Utilization, and Outcomes.颅缝早闭的治疗:医院手术量对成本、资源利用及治疗结果的影响
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jul;29(5):1233-1236. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004561.
7
The Cost of Failure: Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Rescuing Patients from Major Complications After Liver Resection Using the National Inpatient Sample.失败的代价:利用国家住院患者样本评估肝切除术后挽救患者重大并发症的成本效益。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Oct;22(10):1688-1696. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3826-6. Epub 2018 May 31.
8
Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Lobectomies.机器人辅助肺叶切除术的医院容量和结果。
Chest. 2017 Feb;151(2):329-339. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Cleft palate surgery: an evaluation of length of stay, complications, and costs by hospital type.腭裂手术:按医院类型评估住院时间、并发症及费用
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Jul;51(4):412-9. doi: 10.1597/12-150. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
10
The center volume-outcome effect in pancreas transplantation: a national analysis.胰腺移植中的中心容量-结局效应:一项全国性分析。
J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 1;213:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.025. Epub 2017 Feb 24.