Suppr超能文献

阿司匹林合用对塞来昔布、萘普生或布洛芬安全性的影响。

Effect of Aspirin Coadministration on the Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Apr 24;71(16):1741-1751. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.036.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and aspirin coadministration is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the safety of combining NSAIDs with low-dose aspirin.

METHODS

This analysis of the PRECISION (Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety Versus Ibuprofen or Naproxen) trial included 23,953 patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis at increased cardiovascular risk randomized to celecoxib, ibuprofen, or naproxen. The on-treatment population was used for this study. Outcomes included composite major adverse cardiovascular events, noncardiovascular death, gastrointestinal or renal events, and components of the composite. Cox proportional hazards models compared outcomes among NSAIDs stratified by aspirin use following propensity score adjustment. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the cumulative probability of events.

RESULTS

When taken without aspirin, naproxen or ibuprofen had greater risk for the primary composite endpoint compared with celecoxib (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22 to 1.90, p <0.001; and HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.46 to 2.26; p <0.001, respectively). Compared with celecoxib, ibuprofen had more major adverse cardiovascular events (p < 0.05), and both ibuprofen and naproxen had more gastrointestinal (p < 0.001) and renal (p < 0.05) events. Taken with aspirin, ibuprofen had greater risk for the primary composite endpoint compared with celecoxib (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.51; p < 0.01); this was not significantly higher with naproxen (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.41; p = 0.08). Among patients on aspirin, major adverse cardiovascular events were similar among NSAIDs, and compared with celecoxib, ibuprofen had more gastrointestinal and renal events (p < 0.05), while naproxen had more gastrointestinal events (p < 0.05), without a difference in renal events. Similar results were seen on adjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Celecoxib has a more favorable overall safety profile than naproxen or ibuprofen when taken without aspirin. Adding aspirin attenuates the safety advantage of celecoxib, although celecoxib is still associated with fewer gastrointestinal events than ibuprofen or naproxen and fewer renal events than ibuprofen. (Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety vs Ibuprofen or Naproxen [PRECISION]; NCT00346216).

摘要

背景

非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和阿司匹林联合使用的安全性尚不确定。

目的

本研究旨在比较 NSAID 与低剂量阿司匹林联合使用的安全性。

方法

这项对 PRECISION(塞来昔布综合安全性与布洛芬或萘普生前瞻性随机评估)试验的分析纳入了 23953 例患有骨关节炎或类风湿关节炎且心血管风险增加的患者,这些患者被随机分配至塞来昔布、布洛芬或萘普生组。本研究采用治疗人群。研究终点包括复合主要不良心血管事件、非心血管死亡、胃肠道或肾脏事件以及复合事件的组成部分。采用 Cox 比例风险模型比较了按阿司匹林使用情况分层的 NSAID 之间的结局,并进行了倾向评分调整。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析比较了事件的累积概率。

结果

未服用阿司匹林时,与塞来昔布相比,萘普生或布洛芬发生主要复合终点的风险更高(风险比 [HR]:1.52;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.22 至 1.90,p<0.001;HR:1.81;95%CI:1.46 至 2.26;p<0.001)。与塞来昔布相比,布洛芬发生主要不良心血管事件的风险更高(p<0.05),布洛芬和萘普生发生胃肠道事件的风险更高(p<0.001),发生肾脏事件的风险更高(p<0.05)。与塞来昔布相比,服用阿司匹林时,布洛芬发生主要复合终点的风险更高(HR:1.27;95%CI:1.06 至 1.51;p<0.01);而萘普生的风险没有显著升高(HR:1.18;95%CI:0.98 至 1.41;p=0.08)。在服用阿司匹林的患者中,NSAID 之间主要不良心血管事件相似,与塞来昔布相比,布洛芬发生胃肠道和肾脏事件的风险更高(p<0.05),而萘普生发生胃肠道事件的风险更高(p<0.05),但肾脏事件无差异。调整后的 Kaplan-Meier 分析也得到了类似的结果。

结论

与萘普生或布洛芬相比,塞来昔布在不服用阿司匹林时具有更有利的总体安全性。加用阿司匹林会削弱塞来昔布的安全性优势,尽管塞来昔布与布洛芬或萘普生相比胃肠道事件更少,与布洛芬相比肾脏事件更少。(塞来昔布综合安全性与布洛芬或萘普生前瞻性随机评估[PRECISION];NCT00346216)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验