Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Nutrition. 2018 Oct;54:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
Our objective was to investigate the association between herbal/botanic supplement use and perceived quality of life (QoL), cancer recurrence, and all-cause mortality in colon cancer patients.
Patients (n = 453) newly diagnosed with stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon between 2009 and 2011 were recruited from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. Data including demographic variables, herbal medicine use and frequency, lifestyle, diet, cancer treatment, and QoL were collected by interviews at diagnosis (baseline) and 1 and 2 y after diagnosis. Mortality information was obtained via the National Death Index. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) and Medical Outcomes Short Form 12 (SF-12) were used to evaluate QoL.
At baseline, herbal/botanic supplement users were more likely to have a healthier lifestyle than non-users, including more physical activity (P <0.01), more fruit and vegetable consumption (P = 0.01), less smoking (P <0.01), and less energy intake from fat (P = 0.02). After adjustment for potential confounders, no significant association was found between herbal/botanic supplement use and QoL assessed by FACT-C and SF-12. Similarly, herbal/botanic supplement use was not associated with the risk of recurrence, all-cause mortality or the combined.
In this study, patients with stage II colon cancer using herbal/botanic supplements had no significant improvement in their QoL and no difference in odds of colon cancer recurrence and all-cause mortality over 2 y after diagnosis compared with those who did not use herbs/botanicals. Further studies are warranted to confirm the findings and to focus on types of herbal/botanic supplements.
本研究旨在探讨结肠癌患者使用草药/植物补充剂与生活质量感知(QoL)、癌症复发和全因死亡率之间的关系。
2009 年至 2011 年期间,我们从北卡罗来纳州中央癌症登记处招募了 453 名新诊断为 II 期结肠癌的患者。在诊断时(基线)和诊断后 1 年和 2 年通过访谈收集了包括人口统计学变量、草药使用和使用频率、生活方式、饮食、癌症治疗和 QoL 在内的数据。通过国家死亡指数获得死亡率信息。采用癌症治疗-结直肠癌功能评估量表(FACT-C)和健康调查简表 12 项(SF-12)评估 QoL。
基线时,与非使用者相比,草药/植物补充剂使用者更有可能拥有更健康的生活方式,包括更多的体力活动(P<0.01)、更多的水果和蔬菜摄入(P=0.01)、更少的吸烟(P<0.01)和更少的脂肪摄入(P=0.02)。在调整了潜在混杂因素后,草药/植物补充剂的使用与 FACT-C 和 SF-12 评估的 QoL 之间没有显著关联。同样,草药/植物补充剂的使用与复发风险、全因死亡率或两者均无关联。
在这项研究中,与未使用草药/植物的患者相比,使用草药/植物补充剂的 II 期结肠癌患者在诊断后 2 年内 QoL 没有显著改善,癌症复发和全因死亡率的几率也没有差异。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并关注草药/植物补充剂的类型。